MSI 321URXW
Today
Typical price$1,250
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet +3.5
Buy on AmazonMSI 321URXW or Samsung LS32FM900S?
MSI 321URXW costs $248 less today and also has score 3.5 higher (7.6 vs. 4.1).
MSI 321URXW
7.6score · higher
Samsung LS32FM900S
4.1score
MSI wins 3by componentSamsung wins 0
- 7.0Image4.5
- 8.5Smoothness4.8
- 6.0Connections2.0
- 10.0Ergonomics·
MSI 321URXW is $248 the cheaperSamsung LS32FM900S is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. MSI 321URXW is $248 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only MSI 321URXW works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)Up to $1,500On sale
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
MSI 321URXW wins on image, smoothness and connections.
- 7.0 (wins)Image4.5
- 8.5 (wins)Smoothness4.8
- 6.0 (wins)Connections2.0
- 10.0ErgonomicsN/A
Samsung LS32FM900S
Today
Typical price$1,498
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.1 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
MSI 321URXW
- Amazon Lowest price$1,250Buy on Amazon
LS32FM900S
- Amazon Lowest price$1,498Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | MSI 321URXW | LS32FM900S |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $39.06 menor | $46.81 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | MSI 321URXW | LS32FM900S |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Panel changes | OLED | not listed |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | No | not listed |
| Line changes | MPG | Smart Monitor |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| Sync changes | Adaptive-Sync | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 1 | not listed |
| Built-in speaker changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | Yes | not listed |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 321URXW | LS32FM900S |
Other comparisons
MSI 321URXW orBenQ PD3226G$1,150 · score 3.6Compare
LS32FM900S orLG 39GS95QE$1,860 · score 3.6Compare
MSI 321URXW orMSI 321UP$1,090 · score 5.1Compare
LS32FM900S orLG 45GS95QE$2,109 · score 5.4Compare
MSI 321URXW orMSI 322UR$1,600 · score 5.9Compare
LS32FM900S orLG 49U950A$1,900 · score 3.2Compare
See more 5 comparisons
- MSI 321URXW or Samsung LS32FG810S$1,200 · score 5.9
- LS32FM900S or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
- LS32FM900S or Samsung LS32HG802S$1,832 · score 6.7
- MSI 321URXW or Samsung LS32HG730S$1,500 · score 5.2
- LS32FM900S or ViewSonic XG341C$2,051 · score 4.8
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.