Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

LG 45GS95QE or Samsung LS32FM900S?

LS32FM900S costs $138 less today and also has score 0.3 higher (4.1 vs. 3.8).

LG 45GS95QE

3.8score

Samsung LS32FM900S

4.1score · higher

LG wins 2by componentSamsung wins 1

  • 0.0Image4.5
  • 8.5Smoothness4.8
  • 5.0Connections2.0

Samsung LS32FM900S is $138 the cheaper

$2,138

today

No history yet

$2,000

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

45GS95QE wins on smoothness and connections; LS32FM900S wins on image.

  • 0.0Image4.5 (wins)
  • 8.5 (wins)Smoothness4.8
  • 5.0 (wins)Connections2.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

45GS95QE
LS32FM900S

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math45GS95QELS32FM900S
Price per inch$47.51 menor$62.50

Spec sheet side by side

Item45GS95QELS32FM900S
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes45 ″32 ″
Resolution changesQHD4K
Pixel density changes65 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Line changesUltraGear OLEDSmart Monitor
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes240 Hz165 Hz
Response time (stated)3 ms3 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncnot listed
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports changes1not listed
General
Model code changes45GS95QELS32FM900S

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.