Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Updated today

LG 39GS95QE or Samsung LS32FM900S?

  • Cheapest today39GS95QE$140 less
  • Higher spec sheet scoreLS32FM900S4.1 vs. 3.6

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Score by component, side by side

39GS95QE wins on smoothness; LS32FM900S wins on image.

  • 0.3Image4.5 (wins)
  • 8.5 (wins)Smoothness4.8
  • N/AConnections2.0
  • 3.0ErgonomicsN/A

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

39GS95QE
LS32FM900S

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math39GS95QELS32FM900S
Price per inch$47.69 menor$62.50

Ficha técnica lado a lado

Item39GS95QELS32FM900S
Screen
Type changesUltrawide (21:9 or 32:9)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes39 ″32 ″
Resolution changesQHD4K
Pixel density changes75 ppi138 ppi
Aspect ratio changes21:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Line changesUltraGearSmart Monitor
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes240 Hz165 Hz
Response time (stated)3 ms3 ms
Sync changesG-SYNC®not listed
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
Ergonomics
VESA mount holes changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changes39GS95QELS32FM900S

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.