LG 49U950A
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
2.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonUpdated Nov 6, 2026
LG 49U950A costs $100 less today; LS32FM900S has score 2.1 higher (4.1 vs. 2.0).
2.0score
4.1score · higher
LG wins 0by componentSamsung wins 2
LG 49U950A is $100 the cheaperSamsung LS32FM900S is the cheaper
LS32FM900S wins on image and connections.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
2.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.1 out of 10 on the spec sheet +2.1
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 06/11/2026
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | LG 49U950A | LS32FM900S |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $38.78 menor | $62.50 |
| Item | LG 49U950A | LS32FM900S |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size changes | 49 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 60 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio changes | 32:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | Yes | not listed |
| Line changes | UltraWide | Smart Monitor |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | not listed | 3 ms |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| Built-in speaker changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 49U950A | LS32FM900S |
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.