Asus XG32UCG
Today
Typical price$843
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
2.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAsus XG32UCG or BenQ MA320U?
BenQ MA320U costs $63 less today and also has score 0.7 higher (3.2 vs. 2.5).
Asus XG32UCG
2.5score
BenQ MA320U
3.2score · higher
Asus wins 0by componentBenQ wins 1
- 4.5Image4.5
- 0.0Smoothness0.0
- 2.0Connections3.0
- ·Ergonomics7.0
Asus XG32UCG is the cheaperBenQ MA320U is $63 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
BenQ MA320U wins on connections.
- 4.5Image4.5
- 0.0Smoothness0.0
- 2.0Connections3.0 (wins)
- N/AErgonomics7.0
BenQ MA320U
Today
Typical price$780
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.7
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
Asus XG32UCG
- Amazon Lowest price$843Buy on Amazon
BenQ MA320U
- Amazon Lowest price$780Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Asus XG32UCG | BenQ MA320U |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $26.34 | $24.37 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | Asus XG32UCG | BenQ MA320U |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | not listed | No |
| Line changes | ROG | not listed |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Sync changes | G-SYNC | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C with laptop charging changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | XG32UCG | MA320U |
Other comparisons
Asus XG32UCG orLG 34SR60QC-W$719 · score 4.5Compare
BenQ MA320U orLG 32G810SA$1,000 · score 4.8Compare
Asus XG32UCG orMSI MP225$97 · score 4.3Compare
BenQ MA320U orLG 32GR93U$1,050 · score 4.4Compare
Asus XG32UCG orSamsung LS27HG802S$998 · score 7.7Compare
BenQ MA320U orLG 32U889SA$1,100 · score 4.4Compare
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.