Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Asus XG32UCG or Samsung LS27HG802S?

Asus XG32UCG costs $268 less today; LS27HG802S has score 5.2 higher (7.7 vs. 2.5).

Asus XG32UCG

2.5score

Samsung LS27HG802S

7.7score · higher

Asus wins 0by componentSamsung wins 3

  • 4.5Image7.5
  • 0.0Smoothness8.5
  • 2.0Connections7.0

Asus XG32UCG is $268 the cheaper

$730

today

No history yet

$998

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

LS27HG802S wins on image, smoothness and connections.

  • 4.5Image7.5 (wins)
  • 0.0Smoothness8.5 (wins)
  • 2.0Connections7.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Asus XG32UCG
LS27HG802S

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAsus XG32UCGLS27HG802S
Price per inch$22.81 menor$36.96

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAsus XG32UCGLS27HG802S
Screen
Type changesGeneral use and officeGaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes32 ″27 ″
Resolution4K4K
Pixel density changes138 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Stated HDR changesnot listedHDR 400
Line changesROGOdyssey G8
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes60 Hz240 Hz
Response time (stated) changesnot listed3 ms
Sync changesG-SYNCGsync
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
DisplayPort ports changesnot listed1
USB-CYesYes
General
Model code changesXG32UCGLS27HG802S

Other comparisons

See more 42 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.