BenQ MA320U
Today
Typical price$780
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonBenQ MA320U or LG 32U889SA?
BenQ MA320U costs $320 less today; 32U889SA has score 1.2 higher (4.4 vs. 3.2).
BenQ MA320U
3.2score
LG 32U889SA
4.4score · higher
BenQ wins 1by componentLG wins 3
- 4.5Image6.5
- 0.0Smoothness1.0
- 3.0Connections4.0
- 7.0Ergonomics4.0
- ·Recency5.5
BenQ MA320U is $320 the cheaperLG 32U889SA is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only LG 32U889SA works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)Up to $1,500On sale
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
BenQ MA320U wins on ergonomics; 32U889SA wins on image, smoothness and connections.
- 4.5Image6.5 (wins)
- 0.0Smoothness1.0 (wins)
- 3.0Connections4.0 (wins)
- 7.0 (wins)Ergonomics4.0
- N/ARecency5.5
LG 32U889SA
Today
Typical price$1,100
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.2
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
BenQ MA320U
- Amazon Lowest price$780Buy on Amazon
32U889SA
- Amazon Lowest price$1,100Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | BenQ MA320U | 32U889SA |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $24.37 menor | $34.37 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | BenQ MA320U | 32U889SA |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | IPS |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | No | No |
| Line changes | not listed | Smart Monitor |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | not listed | 5 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | not listed | GtG |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C with laptop charging changes | Yes | not listed |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | No |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | No |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | No |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | MA320U | 32U889SA |
| Release year changes | not listed | 2023 |
Other comparisons
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.