BenQ MA320U
Today
Typical price$780
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonBenQ MA320U or LG 32G810SA?
BenQ MA320U costs $220 less today; 32G810SA has score 1.6 higher (4.8 vs. 3.2).
BenQ MA320U
3.2score
LG 32G810SA
4.8score · higher
BenQ wins 1by componentLG wins 2
- 4.5Image4.5
- 0.0Smoothness4.7
- 3.0Connections7.0
- 7.0Ergonomics3.0
BenQ MA320U is $220 the cheaperLG 32G810SA is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only LG 32G810SA works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Only LG 32G810SA works: 120 Hz or more, 25″ to 32″.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
BenQ MA320U wins on ergonomics; 32G810SA wins on smoothness and connections.
- 4.5Image4.5
- 0.0Smoothness4.7 (wins)
- 3.0Connections7.0 (wins)
- 7.0 (wins)Ergonomics3.0
LG 32G810SA
Today
Typical price$1,000
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.8 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.6
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
BenQ MA320U
- Amazon Lowest price$780Buy on Amazon
32G810SA
- Amazon Lowest price$1,000Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | BenQ MA320U | 32G810SA |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $24.37 menor | $31.25 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | BenQ MA320U | 32G810SA |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | General use and office | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | No | not listed |
| Line changes | not listed | UltraGear |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | not listed | 1 ms |
| Sync changes | not listed | G-Sync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C with laptop charging changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | Yes | not listed |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | MA320U | 32G810SA |
Other comparisons
32G810SA orSamsung LS32FM900S$1,498 · score 4.1Compare
BenQ MA320U orLG 32GR93U$1,050 · score 4.4Compare
32G810SA orSamsung LS32HG730S$1,500 · score 5.2Compare
BenQ MA320U orLG 32U889SA$1,100 · score 4.4Compare
32G810SA orAsus XG27JCG$1,164 · score 5.0Compare
32G810SA orMSI 271QR$1,060 · score 5.6Compare
See more 2 comparisons
- 32G810SA or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
- 32G810SA or Samsung LS27HG802S$998 · score 7.7
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.