Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Best monitor for competitive gaming (144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms) up to $400 today

Today’s picks

  1. The best up to $400
    score 6.4

    27″4K160 Hz

    £295

    No history yet · today

    Amazon: the cheapest today

    Who it’s for: Competitive gaming · Casual gaming and console

    Pros: Pixel density: 163 ppi, better than most of the list; Response time (stated): 0.5 ms, better than most of the list; Sound

    Cons: Refresh rate: 160 Hz, behind most of the list

  2. Best value
    score 5.5

    24″Full HD260 Hz

    £100

    No history yet · today

    Amazon: the cheapest today

    Who it’s for: Competitive gaming · Two monitors

    Pros: Costs 64% less than similar models; Pixel density: 92 ppi, better than most of the list; Refresh rate: 260 Hz, better than most of the list

  3. The cheapest worth buying
    score 5.0

    24″Full HD200 Hz

    £79

    No history yet · today

    Amazon: the cheapest today

    Who it’s for: Competitive gaming · Two monitors

    Pros: Costs 60% less than similar models; Pixel density: 92 ppi, better than most of the list; Response time (stated): 0.3 ms, better than most of the list

  4. Top pick from AOC
    score 6.2

    25″QHD300 Hz

    £179

    No history yet · today

    Amazon: the cheapest today

    Who it’s for: Competitive gaming · Casual gaming and console

    Pros: Costs 66% less than similar models; Pixel density: 117 ppi, better than most of the list; Refresh rate: 300 Hz, better than most of the list

Partner store links: the Radar may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. How we make money

The best monitor for competitive gaming up to $400 today is the Acer XB273KV3, £295 (score 6.4).

All models: Monitors for competitive gaming up to $400

See the 24 highest-scoring modelsHide the list
Models in the segment, from highest score to lowest
ModelPriceScoreBuy
Acer XB273KV3Gaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K£295at Amazon6.4Buy on Amazon
AOC Q25G4SRGaming (144 Hz or more) · 25″ · QHD£179at Amazon6.2Buy on Amazon
ViewSonic VX3418CUltrawide (21:9 or 32:9) · 34″ · UWQHD£185at Amazon6.1Buy on Amazon
AOC Q27G4ZRADGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · QHD£200at Amazon6.0Buy on Amazon
AOC Q27G4SRUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · QHD£229at Amazon6.0Buy on Amazon
AOC CQ27G4Z2ADGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · QHD£170at Amazon5.8Buy on Amazon
Samsung LS27FG606EUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · QHD£229at Amazon5.6Buy on Amazon
AOC 24G4HREADGaming (144 Hz or more) · 24″ · Full HD£100at Amazon5.5Buy on Amazon
Acer KG272Z3Gaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · Full HD£134at Amazon5.4Buy on Amazon
AOC 25G4KURGaming (144 Hz or more) · 25″ · Full HD£169at Amazon5.4Buy on Amazon
Philips 24M2N3201PLGaming (144 Hz or more) · 24″ · Full HD£89at Amazon5.3Buy on Amazon
AOC 24G4ZREGaming (144 Hz or more) · 24″ · Full HD£119at Amazon5.3Buy on Amazon
AOC 24G4ZRGaming (144 Hz or more) · 24″ · Full HD£120at Amazon5.2Buy on Amazon
AOC Q27G42ZEGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · QHD£145at Amazon5.2Buy on Amazon
Samsung LS27FG530EUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · QHD£159at Amazon5.2Buy on Amazon
Acer XV272WU2Gaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · HD£200at Amazon5.2Buy on Amazon
AOC CU34G4ZGaming (144 Hz or more) · 34″ · QHD£329at Amazon5.2Buy on Amazon
Acer XZ342CUVUltrawide (21:9 or 32:9) · 34″ · HD£250at Amazon5.1Buy on Amazon
BenQ EX271QGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · QHD£299at Amazon5.1Buy on Amazon
Asus VG249Q5RGaming (144 Hz or more) · 24″ · Full HD£79at Amazon5.0Buy on Amazon
Philips 27M2N3201PLGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · Full HD£100at Amazon5.0Buy on Amazon
AOC 27G4ZREGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · Full HD£129at Amazon5.0Buy on Amazon
AOC C27G4ZXEDGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · Full HD£130at Amazon5.0Buy on Amazon
AOC Q27G3XMNGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · QHD£279at Amazon5.0Buy on Amazon

Monitors for competitive gaming up to $400 in numbers

How much it costs

Half of the 101 monitors cost up to £150; the range with the most models is from £100 to £150, with 33.

How many models there are in each price range, from £50 to £350. Half cost up to £150; across the whole catalog, the median is £170.19 models between £50 and £10033 models between £100 and £15022 models between £150 and £20014 models between £200 and £25010 models between £250 and £3003 models between £300 and £35019332214103£50£150£250£350
  • half cost up to £150
  • whole catalog: £170

Cheapest £69 Asus VY249HG2 rating 2.7

Most expensive £339 Asus XG27WCMS

See the table by price range
Monitors for competitive gaming up to $400 by price range, against the whole catalog
Price rangeModels in the segmentIn the catalogMedian score of the segmentMedian score of the catalog
Under £752182.73.4
£75 to £150511564.53.5
£150 to £300451334.34.1
£300 to £6003645.24.8
Over £6000315.3
See these models on the price and score map

What changed

This is the first check with history for this segment. Radar checks prices every day: from the next one on, this section shows what got cheaper, what got more expensive and what came in or left.

Confirmed features

Counts only what each model’s listing confirms.

  • 101 of 101 have 144 Hz or more

  • 26 of 101 have confirmed height adjustment

  • 1 of 101 has USB-C confirmed

Against the whole catalog

  • −12%median price below the catalog’s
  • +0.4median spec score: 4.4 vs 4.0
  • 25%of the catalog: 101 of 402 models
See the full table
Monitors for competitive gaming up to $400 against the whole catalog
IndicatorMonitors for competitive gaming up to $400Whole catalogDifference
Models10140225% of the catalog
Median price£150£170−12%
Median score4.44.0+0.4 ponto
Lowest price£69£55+£14
Highest price£339£1,399−£1,060

What the numbers say about monitors for competitive gaming up to $400

  • Raising the budget to up to $500, best by spec sheet becomes o Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU: score 7.0 at £429, 0.6 point higher the leader of this range (Acer XB273KV3, score 6.4 at £295).

How to read these numbers

Pick 1, best score for the price: Acer XB273KV3, £295 at Amazon. The median price of the 101 models on the list is £150.

How we choose
  • The picks combine a high rating and a price in line with the list: each one fits a way of spending, a use, or the brand that shows up most. The pros and cons come from each model’s spec sheet.
  • Stores: Amazon. We include stores we read every day through an open source or an affiliate program: the Radar collection, the Amazon catalog and the factory price database. A store that failed to load today is left out.
  • The same model in two stores is only merged with a catalog code, GTIN or the manufacturer’s full code. When in doubt, only one store is kept. A price far from the collected one (below 60% or above 150%) is left out.
  • Amazon appears without a price, only with the link: we don’t read Amazon prices in bulk.

Next step

See each monitor on the chart

Open the chart already filtered to Monitors for competitive gaming up to $400.

Frequently asked questions

Which is the best monitor for competitive gaming up to $400 today?

Today it is the Acer XB273KV3, for £295 (score 6.4).

Which monitor for competitive gaming up to $400 has the best value today?

The AOC 24G4HREAD, for £100 (score 5.5).

Which monitor for competitive gaming up to $400 costs less without losing spec score?

The Asus VG249Q5R, for £79 (score 5.0).

How much does a monitor for competitive gaming (144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms) and price up to $400 cost?

In the 6 Nov 2026 catalog, the median price of the 101 models in the segment is £150, and prices range from £69 to £339. The final price is the one at the store.

Which monitor for competitive gaming (144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms) and price up to $400 has the highest score?

Among the models in the segment on 6 Nov 2026, the highest spec score is the Acer XB273KV3: 6.4, at £295. The one with the lowest price is the Asus VY249HG2, at £69. Spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.

How does the Radar count the models in this segment?

Included are monitors whose specs or title confirm 144 Hz or more and a stated response time of 1 ms or less. With at least one version at the lowest collected price up to $400. Each model counts once: if it has more than one version within the rule, the price is that of the cheapest version and the others show on the card.

Is it worth spending more than $400?

Raising the budget to up to $500, best by spec sheet becomes o Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU: score 7.0 at £429, 0.6 point higher the leader of this range (Acer XB273KV3, score 6.4 at £295). Compare on the chart before deciding: the score comes from the spec sheet and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability. Data from 6 Nov 2026.

How does the Radar choose the monitors on the "best score for the price" line?

From cheapest to most expensive, the monitor that has a higher spec score than all the cheaper ones in the segment makes the line. Anything that costs more and has an equal or lower score is left out. The line doesn’t say which monitor to buy: it only shows which ones don’t lose on both score and price at once.

How often does this page change?

Every day, with each collection: numbers, chart, ranking and the "What changed" section are rebuilt with the day’s catalog. This edition is from 6 November 2026.

Read next

Where the numbers come from

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT.

The price is the one recorded on the date shown. The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.

Data from 6 Nov 2026.