Monitor Radar
Updated 6 Nov, 2026
Samsung
LS27FG702EUXXU£429
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Who it’s for: Competitive gaming · Casual gaming and console
Pros: Pixel density: 163 ppi, better than most of the list; Refresh rate: 360 Hz, better than most of the list; Response time (stated): 1.0 ms, better than most of the list
Samsung
LS27H800UAUXXU£300
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Who it’s for: Work and study
Pros: Pixel density: 163 ppi, better than most of the list; USB-C; Height
Samsung
LS27H804EAUXXU£250
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Who it’s for: Work and study
Pros: Pixel density: 163 ppi, better than most of the list; Height
Partner store links: the Radar may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. How we make money
The best monitor 4K monitors today is the Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU, £429 (score 7.0).
| Model | Price | Score | Buy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung LS27FG702EUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K | £429at Amazon | 7.0 | Buy on Amazon |
| BenQ EX271UZGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K | £770at Amazon | 7.0 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS27HG802SUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K | £599at Amazon | 6.7 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS27FG810SUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K | £737at Amazon | 6.6 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS27H800UAUXXUGeneral use and office · 27″ · 4K | £300at Amazon | 6.5 | Buy on Amazon |
| Acer XB273KV3Gaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K | £295at Amazon | 6.4 | Buy on Amazon |
| BenQ EX271UGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K | £465at Amazon | 6.1 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS32HG802SUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £649at Amazon | 6.1 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS27H804EAUXXUGeneral use and office · 27″ · 4K | £250at Amazon | 6.0 | Buy on Amazon |
| Asus XG32UCWMGGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £674at Amazon | 6.0 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS32FG816SUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £599at Amazon | 5.9 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS32HG732SUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £699at Amazon | 5.7 | Buy on Amazon |
| BenQ EX2710UGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K | £530at Amazon | 5.5 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS27DG702EUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 27″ · 4K | £409at Amazon | 5.4 | Buy on Amazon |
| AOC AG326UDAMGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £572at Amazon | 5.4 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS32DG802SUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £843at Amazon | 5.4 | Buy on Amazon |
| Asus PG32UCDPGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £679at Amazon | 5.3 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS32H804EAUXXUGeneral use and office · 32″ · 4K | £300at Amazon | 5.1 | Buy on Amazon |
| Acer XV325QKGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £494at Amazon | 5.1 | Buy on Amazon |
| AOC U27B3AGeneral use and office · 27″ · 4K | £179at Amazon | 5.0 | Buy on Amazon |
| AOC U27B3MGeneral use and office · 27″ · 4K | £179at Amazon | 4.8 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS32DG702EUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £479at Amazon | 4.8 | Buy on Amazon |
| LG 49U950AUltrawide (21:9 or 32:9) · 49″ · 5K | £1,099at Amazon | 4.8 | Buy on Amazon |
| Samsung LS32FM902SUXXUGaming (144 Hz or more) · 32″ · 4K | £999at Amazon | 4.7 | Buy on Amazon |
Half of the 75 monitors cost up to £479; the range with the most models is from £200 to £400, with 26.
Cheapest £179 AOC U27B3A rating 5.0
Most expensive £1,200 BenQ SW272U
| Price range | Models in the segment | In the catalog | Median score of the segment | Median score of the catalog |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under £75 | 0 | 18 | 3.4 | |
| £75 to £150 | 0 | 156 | 3.5 | |
| £150 to £300 | 24 | 133 | 4.9 | 4.1 |
| £300 to £600 | 31 | 64 | 5.4 | 4.8 |
| Over £600 | 20 | 31 | 5.6 | 5.3 |
This is the first check with history for this segment. Radar checks prices every day: from the next one on, this section shows what got cheaper, what got more expensive and what came in or left.
Spec score from 0 to 10, with today’s price.
7 brands have a model here; Samsung has the most, with 24 models.
and 2 brands more
Counts only what each model’s listing confirms.
28 of 75 have 144 Hz or more
26 of 75 have USB-C confirmed
14 of 75 have confirmed height adjustment
| Indicator | 4K monitors | Whole catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Models | 75 | 402 | 19% of the catalog |
| Median price | £479 | £170 | +182% |
| Median score | 5.4 | 4.0 | +1.3 ponto |
| Lowest price | £179 | £55 | +£124 |
| Highest price | £1,200 | £1,399 | −£199 |
Pick a size. Applies to all pages ·
Pick 1, best score for the price: Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU, £429 at Amazon, on 06/11/2026. The median price of the 75 models on the list is £479.
Next step
Open the chart already filtered to 4K monitors.
Today it is the Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU, for £429 (score 7.0).
The Samsung LS27H800UAUXXU, for £300 (score 6.5).
The Samsung LS27H804EAUXXU, for £250 (score 6.0).
In the 6 Nov 2026 catalog, the median price of the 75 models in the segment is £479, and prices range from £179 to £1,200. The final price is the one at the store.
Among the models in the segment on 6 Nov 2026, the highest spec score is the Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU: 7.0, at £429. The one with the lowest price is the AOC U27B3A, at £179. Spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
Models whose specs confirm 4K resolution (3840 x 2160) are included. Specs missing that information are left out. Each model counts once: if it has more than one version within the rule, the price is that of the cheapest version and the others show on the card.
From cheapest to most expensive, the monitor that has a higher spec score than all the cheaper ones in the segment makes the line. Anything that costs more and has an equal or lower score is left out. The line doesn’t say which monitor to buy: it only shows which ones don’t lose on both score and price at once.
Every day, with each collection: numbers, chart, ranking and the "What changed" section are rebuilt with the day’s catalog. This edition is from 6 November 2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT.
The price is the one recorded on the date shown. The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
Data from 6 Nov 2026.
