14% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 18 models with a score between 1.7 and 2.7 have a median price of $179.
Updated Nov 12, 2026
$203
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
2.2out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor Samsung LC27F398FW was $203 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The price shown is the one from the last check.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 2.2 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: smoothness and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
14% above
The 18 models with a score between 1.7 and 2.7 have a median price of $179.
#66 of 68
Among the 68 models in the $200 to $400 range, the median score is 4.6.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$7.52 per inch
The 247 models from 24 to 30 inches cost $7.08 per inch (median). Math: $203 ÷ 27 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Samsung LC27F398FW wins on connections (5.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Acer X27U wins on ergonomics (10.0 vs. 3.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Samsung LC27F398FW wins on connections (5.0 vs. 1.0)
Compare side by sideSamsung
LS32C392EANXGO$200
checked today
ProsSound
Cons69 ppi · below average
Dell
P2419H$202
checked today
Who it’s forTwo monitors · Work and study
Cons60 Hz · below average
MSI
G272QPF$205
See price in the store
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
Pros109 ppi · above average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | General use and office |
| Size | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 82 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Smoothness | |
| Response time (stated) | 4 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| Ergonomics | |
| VESA mount holes | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | LC27F398FW |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, stated hdr, line, refresh rate, response time measurement, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), color and release year.
In November 12, 2026, Samsung LC27F398FW costs $203 (score 2.2); the range median is $289 across 68 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $203, checked in 12/11.
On Nov 12, 2026, the collected price of Samsung LC27F398FW is $203. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 18 models with a score between 1.7 and 2.7 have a median price of $179, and Samsung LC27F398FW costs $203, 14% above. In the $200 to $400 range, the median score of the 68 models is 4.6; Samsung LC27F398FW's is 2.2, below the previous check, the 66º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Image (0.8, vs. 3.6 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms curved screen. Not confirmed in the specs: 144 Hz or more, QHD, 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.