24% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 56 models with a score between 3.2 and 4.2 have a median price of $185.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$230
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
3.7out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor AOC CQ32G4Z was $230 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $230.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 3.7 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, tiedthe in 1, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: connections and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
24% above
The 56 models with a score between 3.2 and 4.2 have a median price of $185.
#32 of 46
Among the 46 models in the $200 to $400 range, the median score is 4.4.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$7.19 per inch
The 119 models from 30 to 35 inches cost $10.59 per inch (median). Math: $230 ÷ 32 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Higher score, similar price
BenQ EX271U wins on image (6.0 vs. 1.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
AOC CQ32G4Z wins on smoothness (7.0 vs. 4.0)
Compare side by sideMSI
MP341CQ$224
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Asus
XG27ACS$229
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Samsung
LS25BG402ENXGO$230
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 260 Hz |
| Ergonomics | |
| VESA mount holes | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | CQ32G4Z |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, stated hdr, line, response time (stated), response time measurement, sync, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), color and release year.
In November 6, 2026, AOC CQ32G4Z costs $230 (score 3.7); the range median is $283 across 46 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of AOC CQ32G4Z is $230. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 56 models with a score between 3.2 and 4.2 have a median price of $185, and AOC CQ32G4Z costs $230, 24% above. In the $200 to $400 range, the median score of the 46 models is 4.4; AOC CQ32G4Z's is 3.7, below the median, the 32º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Image (1.5, vs. 2.6 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more, QHD and curved screen. Not confirmed in the specs: 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.