#72 of 72
Score below the price range
Among the 72 models in the $100 to $200 range, the median score is 3.8.
Updated Nov 12, 2026
$200
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
0.8out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor Samsung LS32C392EANXGO was $200 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The price shown is the one from the last check.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 0.8 of 10 At the median or below, below on 3.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, it depends on how you use it: the reasons, compared with the rest of the catalog:
#72 of 72
Among the 72 models in the $100 to $200 range, the median score is 3.8.
2 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$6.25 per inch
The 106 models from 28 to 34 inches cost $9.23 per inch (median). Math: $200 ÷ 32 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Sceptre FWD240 wins on smoothness (9.5 vs. 1.8)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Acer EDA323QU wins on connections (7.0 vs. 1.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
MSI G32C4 wins on connections (5.0 vs. 1.0)
Compare side by sideBenQ
EW270Q$200
checked today
Who it’s forCreative work (photo and video)
Pros54% below similar
ConsNo height adjustment
LG
32U701B$200
checked today
Pros138 ppi · above average
Cons60 Hz · below average
Dell
P2419H$202
checked today
Who it’s forTwo monitors · Work and study
Cons60 Hz · below average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 69 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | |
| Built-in speaker | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | LS32C392EANXGO |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, stated hdr, line, response time (stated), response time measurement, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, color and release year.
In November 12, 2026, Samsung LS32C392EANXGO costs $200 (score 0.8); the range median is $153 across 72 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $200, checked in 12/11.
On Nov 12, 2026, the collected price of Samsung LS32C392EANXGO is $200. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
In the $100 to $200 range, the median score of the 72 models is 3.8; Samsung LS32C392EANXGO's is 0.8, below the previous check, the 72º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Smoothness (1.8, vs. 6.5 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms curved screen. Not confirmed in the specs: 144 Hz or more, QHD, 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.