34% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 21 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of $172.
Updated Nov 12, 2026
$230
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
2.3out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor LG 34U530A was $230 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The price shown is the one from the last check.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 2.3 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 2.
No data on the spec sheet: recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
34% above
The 21 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of $172.
#65 of 68
Among the 68 models in the $200 to $400 range, the median score is 4.6.
2 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$6.76 per inch
The 108 models from 29 to 37 inches cost $9.37 per inch (median). Math: $230 ÷ 34 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Sceptre QUT168 wins on smoothness (9.5 vs. 2.3)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Asus VG34WQML5A wins on smoothness (10.0 vs. 2.3)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
MSI MP341CQ wins on smoothness (6.0 vs. 2.3)
Compare side by sideMSI
MP341CQ$230
checked today
Pros110 ppi · above average
Cons120 Hz · below average
AOC
CQ32G4Z$230
checked today
Who it’s forCasual gaming and console
Pros260 Hz · above average · VESA
MSI
MP341CQW$235$240
1.9% below the previous check
checked today
Pros23% below similar
Cons120 Hz · below average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) |
| Size | 34 ″ |
| Resolution | WFHD |
| Pixel density | 82 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 |
| Line | UltraWide |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| Ergonomics | |
| VESA mount holes | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | 34U530A |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, response time (stated), response time measurement, sync, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), color and release year.
In November 12, 2026, LG 34U530A costs $230 (score 2.3); the range median is $289 across 68 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $230, checked in 12/11.
On Nov 12, 2026, the collected price of LG 34U530A is $230. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 21 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of $172, and LG 34U530A costs $230, 34% above. In the $200 to $400 range, the median score of the 68 models is 4.6; LG 34U530A's is 2.3, below the previous check, the 65º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Smoothness (2.3, vs. 6.5 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.