11% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 111 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of $316.
Updated 12 Nov 2026
$350
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
4.3out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor LG 32GS60QC was $350 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The last 30 days of history are on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 12/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $350.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 4.3 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 3.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
11% above
The 111 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of $316.
#58 of 116
Among the 116 models in the $270 to $540 range, the median score is 4.3.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$10.94 per inch
The 153 models from 28 to 34 inches cost $15.62 per inch (median). Math: $350 ÷ 32 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
LG 32U401B wins on smoothness (9.5 vs. 6.5)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
MSI 321UPD wins on image (4.5 vs. 2.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
LG
24BP750C$346
checked today
Who it’s forTwo monitors · Work and study
ProsSound · USB-C
Cons75 Hz · below average
Samsung
LS32H702EA$348
checked today
Pros138 ppi · above average
Cons60 Hz · below average
MSI
325CQF$350
checked today
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
Pros0.5 ms · below average · Sound
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Stated HDR | HDR10 |
| Line | UltraGear |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync™ |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | 32GS60QC |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, response time measurement, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In 12 November 2026, LG 32GS60QC costs $350 (score 4.3); the range median is $357 across 116 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $350, checked in 12/11.
On 12 Nov 2026, the collected price of LG 32GS60QC is $350. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 111 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of $316, and LG 32GS60QC costs $350, 11% above. In the $270 to $540 range, the median score of the 116 models is 4.3; LG 32GS60QC's is 4.3, at the median, the 58º among them. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more, QHD and curved screen. Not confirmed in the specs: 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.