65% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 100 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of $272.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$450
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
3.9out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor AOC Q27G2S was $450 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $450.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 3.9 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: connections and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
65% above
The 100 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of $272.
#51 of 90
Among the 90 models in the $270 to $540 range, the median score is 4.0.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$16.65 per inch
The 409 models from 23 to 30 inches cost $10.83 per inch (median). Math: $450 ÷ 27 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
MSI MP225 wins on smoothness (9.5 vs. 5.8)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
MSI 275UPD wins on smoothness (9.5 vs. 5.8)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
AOC Q27G2S wins on smoothness (5.8 vs. 4.0)
Compare side by sideLG
34U530A$447
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Acer
XV275K$448
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
AOC
Q27G4SMN$460
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms |
| Sync | G-SYNC |
| Ergonomics | |
| Height adjustment | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | Q27G2S |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, line, response time measurement, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In November 6, 2026, AOC Q27G2S costs $450 (score 3.9); the range median is $352 across 90 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of AOC Q27G2S is $450. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 100 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of $272, and AOC Q27G2S costs $450, 65% above. In the $270 to $540 range, the median score of the 90 models is 4.0; AOC Q27G2S's is 3.9, at the median, the 51º among them. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more, QHD and height adjustment. Not confirmed in the specs: 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C and curved screen. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.