Samsung LS27FG500E
Today
Typical price$350
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.3 out of 10 on the spec sheet +3.0
Buy on AmazonSamsung LS27FG500E or Samsung LS27HG312E?
LS27HG312E costs $222 less today; LS27FG500E has score 3.0 higher (5.3 vs. 2.3).
Samsung LS27FG500E
5.3score · higher
Samsung LS27HG312E
2.3score
Samsung LS27FG500E wins 3by componentSamsung LS27HG312E wins 0
- 6.1Image0.8
- 6.5Smoothness4.7
- 5.0Connections2.0
- 0.0Ergonomics·
Samsung LS27FG500E is the cheaperSamsung LS27HG312E is $222 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work. Samsung LS27HG312E is $222 cheaper.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. Samsung LS27HG312E is $222 cheaper.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)
Only Samsung LS27FG500E works: QHD or 4K with an IPS or OLED panel.
Monitors for creative work (photo and video)Up to $550On sale
Cheap monitors worth buying
Only Samsung LS27HG312E works: Full HD with 100 Hz or more.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors to use two on the desk.
The comparison in detail
Samsung Odyssey G3 or Odyssey G5: all sizes
Score by component, side by side
LS27FG500E wins on image, smoothness and connections.
- 6.1 (wins)Image0.8
- 6.5 (wins)Smoothness4.7
- 5.0 (wins)Connections2.0
- 0.0ErgonomicsN/A
Samsung LS27HG312E
Today
Typical price$128
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
2.3 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
LS27FG500E
- Amazon Lowest price$350Buy on Amazon
LS27HG312E
- Amazon Lowest price$128Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | LS27FG500E | LS27HG312E |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $12.96 | $4.74 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | LS27FG500E | LS27HG312E |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | Full HD |
| Pixel density changes | 109 ppi | 82 ppi |
| Panel changes | OLED | not listed |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | Yes | not listed |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR10 | not listed |
| Line changes | Odyssey G5 | Odyssey G3 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 180 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | GtG | not listed |
| Sync changes | G-Sync | Freesync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 1 | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | LS27FG500E | LS27HG312E |
Other comparisons
LS27FG500E orAsus XG27ACS$369 · score 5.7Compare
LS27HG312E orAcer QG271$149 · score 2.8Compare
LS27FG500E orMSI 272QP$580 · score 4.7Compare
LS27HG312E orAcer VG270$200 · score 2.7Compare
LS27FG500E orSamsung LS27H710EA$350 · score 4.0Compare
LS27HG312E orBenQ GW2790TC$205 · score 1.5Compare
See more 9 comparisons
- LS27HG312E or Lenovo L27-4E$164 · score 2.8
- LS27FG500E or MSI 325CQF$350 · score 4.5
- LS27HG312E or MSI MP271CA$158 · score 2.5
- LS27FG500E or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
- LS27FG500E or MSI MP252$344 · score 4.2
- LS27HG312E or Samsung LS27HG314E$210 · score 2.3
- LS27HG312E or Acer KG241Y$135 · score 4.4
- LS27HG312E or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
- LS27HG312E or Samsung LS27HG550E$350 · score 4.4
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.