BenQ GW2790TC
Today
Typical price$205
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
1.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonBenQ GW2790TC or Samsung LS27HG312E?
LS27HG312E costs $77 less today and also has score 0.8 higher (2.3 vs. 1.5).
BenQ GW2790TC
1.5score
Samsung LS27HG312E
2.3score · higher
BenQ wins 0by componentSamsung wins 1
- 0.8Image0.8
- 2.2Smoothness4.7
- 2.0Connections2.0
BenQ GW2790TC is the cheaperSamsung LS27HG312E is $77 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only Samsung LS27HG312E works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. Samsung LS27HG312E is $77 cheaper.
Cheap monitors worth buying
Both work. Samsung LS27HG312E is $77 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
LS27HG312E wins on smoothness.
- 0.8Image0.8
- 2.2Smoothness4.7 (wins)
- 2.0Connections2.0
Samsung LS27HG312E
Today
Typical price$128
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
2.3 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.8
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
GW2790TC
- Amazon Lowest price$205Buy on Amazon
LS27HG312E
- Amazon Lowest price$128Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | GW2790TC | LS27HG312E |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $7.59 | $4.74 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | GW2790TC | LS27HG312E |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 82 ppi | 82 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Line changes | not listed | Odyssey G3 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | not listed | 1 ms |
| Sync changes | not listed | Freesync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | GW2790TC | LS27HG312E |
Other comparisons
GW2790TC orAcer KG240Y$154 · score 5.5Compare
LS27HG312E orAcer QG271$149 · score 2.8Compare
GW2790TC orMSI MP225$97 · score 4.3Compare
LS27HG312E orAcer VG270$200 · score 2.7Compare
LS27HG312E orLenovo L27-4E$164 · score 2.8Compare
LS27HG312E orMSI MP271CA$158 · score 2.5Compare
See more 5 comparisons
- LS27HG312E or Samsung LS27FG500E$350 · score 5.3
- LS27HG312E or Samsung LS27HG314E$210 · score 2.3
- LS27HG312E or Acer KG241Y$135 · score 4.4
- LS27HG312E or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
- LS27HG312E or Samsung LS27HG550E$350 · score 4.4
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.