BenQ MA320U
Today
Typical price$780
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonBenQ MA320U or Samsung LS32FM702U?
LS32FM702U costs $280 less today and also has score 0.2 higher (3.4 vs. 3.2).
BenQ MA320U
3.2score
Samsung LS32FM702U
3.4score · higher
BenQ wins 0by componentSamsung wins 2
- 4.5Image4.5
- 0.0Smoothness1.5
- 3.0Connections4.0
- 7.0Ergonomics·
BenQ MA320U is the cheaperSamsung LS32FM702U is $280 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
LS32FM702U wins on smoothness and connections.
- 4.5Image4.5
- 0.0Smoothness1.5 (wins)
- 3.0Connections4.0 (wins)
- 7.0ErgonomicsN/A
Samsung LS32FM702U
Today
Typical price$500
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.2
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
BenQ MA320U
- Amazon Lowest price$780Buy on Amazon
LS32FM702U
- Amazon Lowest price$500Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | BenQ MA320U | LS32FM702U |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $24.37 | $15.62 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | BenQ MA320U | LS32FM702U |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | No | not listed |
| Line changes | not listed | Smart Monitor |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | not listed | 4 ms |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C with laptop charging changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | Yes | not listed |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | MA320U | LS32FM702U |
Other comparisons
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.