BenQ MA320U
Today
Typical price$780
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonBenQ MA320U or MSI 321CUPDF?
321CUPDF costs $188 less today and also has score 3.5 higher (6.7 vs. 3.2).
BenQ MA320U
3.2score
MSI 321CUPDF
6.7score · higher
BenQ wins 0by componentMSI wins 2
- 4.5Image4.5
- 0.0Smoothness10.0
- 3.0Connections6.0
- 7.0Ergonomics7.0
BenQ MA320U is the cheaperMSI 321CUPDF is $188 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only MSI 321CUPDF works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Only MSI 321CUPDF works: 120 Hz or more, 25″ to 32″.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
321CUPDF wins on smoothness and connections.
- 4.5Image4.5
- 0.0Smoothness10.0 (wins)
- 3.0Connections6.0 (wins)
- 7.0Ergonomics7.0
MSI 321CUPDF
Today
Typical price$592
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.7 out of 10 on the spec sheet +3.5
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
BenQ MA320U
- Amazon Lowest price$780Buy on Amazon
321CUPDF
- Amazon Lowest price$592Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | BenQ MA320U | 321CUPDF |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $24.37 | $18.49 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | BenQ MA320U | 321CUPDF |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | General use and office | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | No | not listed |
| Line changes | not listed | MAG |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 60 Hz | 320 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | not listed | 0.5 ms |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | not listed | 1 |
| USB-C changes | Yes | not listed |
| USB-C with laptop charging changes | Yes | not listed |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | MA320U | 321CUPDF |
Other comparisons
BenQ MA320U orLG 32G810SA$1,000 · score 4.8Compare
321CUPDF orAOC Q32E4U$551 · score 4.4Compare
BenQ MA320U orLG 32GR93U$1,050 · score 4.4Compare
321CUPDF orAsus XG32UCG$843 · score 2.5Compare
BenQ MA320U orLG 32U889SA$1,100 · score 4.4Compare
321CUPDF orLG 32UN880K$700 · score 4.7Compare
See more 3 comparisons
- 321CUPDF or LG 32UP83AK$600 · score 4.4
- 321CUPDF or Samsung LS32A600NANXGO$651 · score 2.9
- 321CUPDF or Samsung LS32H804UANXGO$603 · score 4.3
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.