14% below
Costs less than others charge for this score
The 86 models with a score between 3.5 and 4.5 have a median price of £181.
Updated 6 Nov, 2026
£157
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
4.0out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor LG 27GS50F was £157 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is £157.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 4.0 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, it depends on how you use it: the reasons, compared with the rest of the catalog:
14% below
The 86 models with a score between 3.5 and 4.5 have a median price of £181.
#43 of 81
Among the 81 models in the £150 to £300 range, the median score is 4.1.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
£5.81 per inch
The 264 models from 24 to 29 inches cost £5.42 per inch (median). Math: £157 ÷ 27 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
AOC 24B3HA2 wins on smoothness (8.5 vs. 6.5)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Samsung LS27H800UAUXXU wins on image (7.0 vs. 1.8)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
LG
24ML600S£155
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
BenQ
GW2790TC£155
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Samsung
LS27FG530EUXXU£159
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 82 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR | HDR 10 |
| Line | UltraGear |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | 27GS50F |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, response time measurement, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In 6 November 2026, LG 27GS50F costs £157 (score 4.0); the range median is £209 across 81 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On 6 Nov 2026, the collected price of LG 27GS50F is £157. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts in its favor: the 86 models with a score between 3.5 and 4.5 have a median price of £181, and LG 27GS50F costs £157, 14% below. In the £150 to £300 range, the median score of the 81 models is 4.1; LG 27GS50F's is 4.0, at the median, the 43º among them. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more. Not confirmed in the specs: QHD, 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C, curved screen and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.