43% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 88 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of £174.
Updated 6 Nov, 2026
£249
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
4.3out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Philips 34M2C3500L was £249 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is £249.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 4.3 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, tiedthe in 1, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
43% above
The 88 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of £174.
#34 of 81
Among the 81 models in the £150 to £300 range, the median score is 4.1.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
£7.32 per inch
The 106 models from 29 to 39 inches cost £8.51 per inch (median). Math: £249 ÷ 34 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Philips 34M2C3500L wins on connections (5.0 vs. 3.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Samsung LS27H800UAUXXU wins on image (7.0 vs. 2.1)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Philips 34M2C3500L wins on smoothness (7.0 vs. 4.5)
Compare side by sideLG
34G600A£240
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Iiyama
XUB3493WQSU£240
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
LG
34U620B£249
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 34 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD |
| Pixel density | 86 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Stated HDR | HDR10 |
| Line | Evnia |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 0.5 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | 34M2C3500L |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, response time measurement, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In 6 November 2026, Philips 34M2C3500L costs £249 (score 4.3); the range median is £209 across 81 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On 6 Nov 2026, the collected price of Philips 34M2C3500L is £249. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 88 models with a score between 3.8 and 4.8 have a median price of £174, and Philips 34M2C3500L costs £249, 43% above. In the £150 to £300 range, the median score of the 81 models is 4.1; Philips 34M2C3500L's is 4.3, above the median, the 34º among them. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more, QHD and curved screen. Not confirmed in the specs: 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.