3% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 77 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of £164.
Updated 6 Nov, 2026
£169
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
3.9out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Philips 32M2C5501-32 was £169 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is £169.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 3.9 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, it depends on how you use it: the reasons, compared with the rest of the catalog:
3% above
The 77 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of £164.
#47 of 81
Among the 81 models in the £150 to £300 range, the median score is 4.1.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
£5.28 per inch
The 102 models from 28 to 34 inches cost £8.37 per inch (median). Math: £169 ÷ 32 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
AOC 24B3HA2 wins on smoothness (8.5 vs. 6.5)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Samsung LS27H800UAUXXU wins on image (7.0 vs. 1.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Philips 32M2C5501-32 wins on connections (5.0 vs. 3.0)
Compare side by sideLG
27BA650£169
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Philips
27E1N1800AE£169
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
AOC
25G4KUR£169
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Line | Evnia |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | 32M2C5501-32 |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, stated hdr, response time measurement, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In 6 November 2026, Philips 32M2C5501-32 costs £169 (score 3.9); the range median is £209 across 81 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On 6 Nov 2026, the collected price of Philips 32M2C5501-32 is £169. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
The price is typical: the 77 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of £164, and Philips 32M2C5501-32 costs £169, 3% above. In the £150 to £300 range, the median score of the 81 models is 4.1; Philips 32M2C5501-32's is 3.9, below the median, the 47º among them. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more, QHD and curved screen. Not confirmed in the specs: 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.