91% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 28 models with a score between 1.9 and 2.9 have a median price of $162.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$310
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
2.4out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Philips 346E2CUAE was $310 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $310.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 2.4 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 1, below on 2.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
91% above
The 28 models with a score between 1.9 and 2.9 have a median price of $162.
#44 of 46
Among the 46 models in the $200 to $400 range, the median score is 4.4.
2 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$9.12 per inch
The 126 models from 30 to 39 inches cost $10.93 per inch (median). Math: $310 ÷ 34 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Sceptre E225W wins on connections (6.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
BenQ EX271U wins on connections (7.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
LG 34WR55QK wins on connections (5.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideSamsung
LS32DG502E$300
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
LG
32UR550K$305
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
MSI
MD342CQPW$340
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) |
| Size | 34 ″ |
| Resolution | UWQHD |
| Pixel density | 110 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| Connections | |
| USB-C | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | 346E2CUAE |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, stated hdr, line, response time (stated), response time measurement, sync, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, color and release year.
In November 6, 2026, Philips 346E2CUAE costs $310 (score 2.4); the range median is $283 across 46 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of Philips 346E2CUAE is $310. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 28 models with a score between 1.9 and 2.9 have a median price of $162, and Philips 346E2CUAE costs $310, 91% above. In the $200 to $400 range, the median score of the 46 models is 4.4; Philips 346E2CUAE's is 2.4, below the median, the 44º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Smoothness (2.3, vs. 6.5 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms USB-C and curved screen. Not confirmed in the specs: 144 Hz or more, QHD, 4K, IPS, OLED and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.