45% below
Costs half what others charge for this score
The 51 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of $190.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$104
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
3.9out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Philips 22E2N1100 was $104 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $104.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 3.9 of 10 Above the median on 2 componentes, tiedthe in 1.
No data on the spec sheet: connections and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, yes: the score of a pricier monitorthe at the price of a cheaper monitorthe.
45% below
The 51 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of $190.
#15 of 60
Among the 60 models in the $100 to $200 range, the median score is 3.3.
+1.3 in smoothness
Refresh rate in Hz, compared with monitors of the same type, and the response time stated by the manufacturer above what the range delivers.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$4.75 per inch
The 91 models from 19 to 25 inches cost $4.61 per inch (median). Math: $104 ÷ 22 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Higher score, similar price
MSI MP251W wins on smoothness (9.5 vs. 7.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
MSI
272FB$100
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
MSI
MP243W$100
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Dell
SE2726H$109
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | General use and office |
| Size | 22 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 100 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| Ergonomics | |
| VESA mount holes | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | 22E2N1100 |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, line, response time (stated), response time measurement, sync, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), color and release year.
In November 6, 2026, Philips 22E2N1100 costs $104 (score 3.9); the range median is $140 across 60 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of Philips 22E2N1100 is $104. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts in its favor: the 51 models with a score between 3.4 and 4.4 have a median price of $190, and Philips 22E2N1100 costs $104, 45% below. In the $100 to $200 range, the median score of the 60 models is 3.3; Philips 22E2N1100's is 3.9, above the median, the 15º among them. By the spec sheet, the strong point is Smoothness (7.0, vs. 5.8 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point below the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.