Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

AOC CQ32G4Z or Koorui E2212H?

Koorui E2212H costs $160 less today and also has score 0.2 higher (3.9 vs. 3.7).

AOC CQ32G4Z

3.7score

Koorui E2212H

3.9score · higher

AOC wins 0by componentKoorui wins 1

  • 1.5Image2.0
  • 7.0Smoothness7.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics3.0

Koorui E2212H is $160 the cheaper

$230

today

No history yet

$70

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Neither one opens a 1-point lead on any component.

  • 1.5Image2.0
  • 7.0Smoothness7.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics3.0

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

AOC CQ32G4Z
Koorui E2212H

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAOC CQ32G4ZKoorui E2212H
Price per inch$7.19$3.18 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAOC CQ32G4ZKoorui E2212H
Screen
Type changesGaming (144 Hz or more)General use and office
Size changes32 ″22 ″
Resolution changesQHDFull HD
Pixel density changes92 ppi100 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes260 Hz120 Hz
Ergonomics
VESA mount holesYesYes
General
Model code changesCQ32G4ZE2212H

Other comparisons

See more 29 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.