25% below
Costs less than others charge for this score
The 64 models with a score between 4.0 and 5.0 have a median price of $240.
Updated Nov 12, 2026
$180
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
4.5out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor AOC CQ32G4VE was $180 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The price shown is the one from the last check.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 4.5 of 10 Above the median on 2 componentes, tiedthe in 1.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, yes: the score of a pricier monitorthe at the price of a cheaper monitorthe.
25% below
The 64 models with a score between 4.0 and 5.0 have a median price of $240.
#19 of 72
Among the 72 models in the $100 to $200 range, the median score is 3.8.
+1.0 in image
Pixel density (resolution divided by screen size), panel type (OLED, IPS, VA, TN) and stated HDR above what the range delivers.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$5.62 per inch
The 106 models from 28 to 34 inches cost $9.23 per inch (median). Math: $180 ÷ 32 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
AOC CQ32G4VE wins on image (2.5 vs. 0.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Acer EDA323QU wins on connections (7.0 vs. 5.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Samsung
LS32D396GA$179
checked today
ProsSound
Cons69 ppi · below average
$179
See price in the store
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
Pros109 ppi · above average
$180
checked today
Who it’s forTwo monitors · Work and study
ProsSound · USB-C
Cons75 Hz · below average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes |
| Stated HDR | HDR |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 0.5 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | CQ32G4VE |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, line, response time measurement, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, color and release year.
In November 12, 2026, AOC CQ32G4VE costs $180 (score 4.5); the range median is $153 across 72 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $180, checked in 12/11.
On Nov 12, 2026, the collected price of AOC CQ32G4VE is $180. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts in its favor: the 64 models with a score between 4.0 and 5.0 have a median price of $240, and AOC CQ32G4VE costs $180, 25% below. In the $100 to $200 range, the median score of the 72 models is 3.8; AOC CQ32G4VE's is 4.5, above the previous check, the 19º among them. By the spec sheet, the strong point is Image (2.5, vs. 1.5 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point below the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms 144 Hz or more, QHD and curved screen. Not confirmed in the specs: 4K, IPS, OLED, USB-C and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.