AOC CQ32G4VE
Today
Previous check$180
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.2
Buy on AmazonAOC CQ32G4VE or LG 32GS60QC-B?
Cost the same today; CQ32G4VE has score 0.2 higher (4.5 vs. 4.3).
AOC CQ32G4VE
4.5score · higher
LG 32GS60QC-B
4.3score
AOC wins 1by componentLG wins 0
- 2.5Image2.5
- 7.0Smoothness6.5
- 5.0Connections5.0
AOC CQ32G4VE is the cheaperLG 32GS60QC-B is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
Neither one opens a 1-point lead on any component.
- 2.5Image2.5
- 7.0Smoothness6.5
- 5.0Connections5.0
LG 32GS60QC-B
Today
Previous check$180
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.3 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
CQ32G4VE
- Amazon Lowest price$180Buy on Amazon
32GS60QC-B
- Amazon Lowest price$180Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | CQ32G4VE | 32GS60QC-B |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $5.62 | $5.62 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | CQ32G4VE | 32GS60QC-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | QHD | QHD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes | Yes |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR | HDR10 |
| Line changes | not listed | UltraGear |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 0.5 ms | 1 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | CQ32G4VE | 32GS60QC-B |
Other comparisons
CQ32G4VE orLG 29U511A$288 · score 3.5Compare
32GS60QC-B orLG 32U701B$200 · score 3.6Compare
CQ32G4VE orLG 32U701SB$270 · score 4.1Compare
32GS60QC-B orMSI G32C4X$188 · score 4.2Compare
CQ32G4VE orMSI 32CQ6F$250 · score 4.5Compare
32GS60QC-B orKoorui E2212H$70 · score 3.9Compare
See more 2 comparisons
- 32GS60QC-B or MSI MP251W$149 · score 5.1
- 32GS60QC-B or Sceptre QUT168$190 · score 4.5
How we choose
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.