LG 32UP83AK
Today
Typical price$600
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.5
Buy on AmazonLG 32UP83AK or Samsung LS32A600NANXGO?
32UP83AK costs $51 less today and also has score 1.5 higher (4.4 vs. 2.9).
LG 32UP83AK
4.4score · higher
Samsung LS32A600NANXGO
2.9score
LG wins 3by componentSamsung wins 1
- 5.5Image2.5
- 0.0Smoothness1.8
- 8.0Connections5.0
- 6.0Ergonomics4.0
LG 32UP83AK is $51 the cheaperSamsung LS32A600NANXGO is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
32UP83AK wins on image, connections and ergonomics; LS32A600NANXGO wins on smoothness.
- 5.5 (wins)Image2.5
- 0.0Smoothness1.8 (wins)
- 8.0 (wins)Connections5.0
- 6.0 (wins)Ergonomics4.0
Samsung LS32A600NANXGO
Today
Typical price$651
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
2.9 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
32UP83AK
- Amazon Lowest price$600Buy on Amazon
LS32A600NANXGO
- Amazon Lowest price$651Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | 32UP83AK | LS32A600NANXGO |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $18.75 menor | $20.34 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | 32UP83AK | LS32A600NANXGO |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution changes | 4K | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 138 ppi | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Line changes | UltraFine | ViewFinity |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 60 Hz | 75 Hz |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C changes | Yes | not listed |
| Built-in speaker changes | Yes | not listed |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | Yes |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | Yes | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 32UP83AK | LS32A600NANXGO |
Other comparisons
32UP83AK orAcer XV325QK$597 · score 5.1Compare
LS32A600NANXGO orLG 34U650A$619 · score 3.7Compare
32UP83AK orAOC Q32E4U$551 · score 4.4Compare
LS32A600NANXGO orMSI MP225$97 · score 4.3Compare
LS32A600NANXGO orSamsung LS27HG802S$998 · score 7.7Compare
32UP83AK orAcer KG241Y$135 · score 4.4Compare
See more 5 comparisons
- LS32A600NANXGO or Samsung LS32DG702E$860 · score 4.7
- 32UP83AK or Acer X27U$500 · score 6.8
- 32UP83AK or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
- 32UP83AK or MSI MD342CQP$480 · score 5.1
- 32UP83AK or MSI MD342CQPW$490 · score 5.1
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.