AOC Q32E4U
Today
Typical price$551
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAOC Q32E4U or LG 32UP83AK?
AOC Q32E4U costs $49 less today, with the same spec sheet score (4.4).
AOC Q32E4U
4.4score
LG 32UP83AK
4.4score
AOC wins 1by componentLG wins 2
- 2.5Image5.5
- 6.2Smoothness0.0
- 6.0Connections8.0
- ·Ergonomics6.0
AOC Q32E4U is $49 the cheaperLG 32UP83AK is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for competitive gaming, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
AOC Q32E4U wins on smoothness; 32UP83AK wins on image and connections.
- 2.5Image5.5 (wins)
- 6.2 (wins)Smoothness0.0
- 6.0Connections8.0 (wins)
- N/AErgonomics6.0
LG 32UP83AK
Today
Typical price$600
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
AOC Q32E4U
- Amazon Lowest price$551Buy on Amazon
32UP83AK
- Amazon Lowest price$600Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | AOC Q32E4U | 32UP83AK |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $17.23 menor | $18.75 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | AOC Q32E4U | 32UP83AK |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | General use and office | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 92 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR | HDR10 |
| Line changes | not listed | UltraFine |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 100 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 4 ms | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C changes | not listed | Yes |
| Built-in speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | not listed | Yes |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | Q32E4U | 32UP83AK |
Other comparisons
AOC Q32E4U orAsus VG27UQEL5A$559 · score 4.8Compare
32UP83AK orAcer XV325QK$597 · score 5.1Compare
AOC Q32E4U orMSI MP225$97 · score 4.3Compare
AOC Q32E4U orSamsung LS27HG802S$998 · score 7.7Compare
32UP83AK orSamsung LS32A600NANXGO$651 · score 2.9Compare
AOC Q32E4U orSamsung LS32H802UANXGO$398 · score 3.7Compare
See more 7 comparisons
- 32UP83AK or Acer KG241Y$135 · score 4.4
- AOC Q32E4U or Samsung LS34A650UBNXGO$550 · score 3.7
- 32UP83AK or Acer X27U$500 · score 6.8
- AOC Q32E4U or Samsung LS37D802UA$748 · score 3.7
- 32UP83AK or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
- 32UP83AK or MSI MD342CQP$480 · score 5.1
- 32UP83AK or MSI MD342CQPW$490 · score 5.1
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.