Gigabyte GS25F2A
Today
Typical price$155
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.2 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonGigabyte GS25F2A or MSI 276CXF?
Gigabyte GS25F2A costs $95 less today; MSI 276CXF has score 0.3 higher (5.5 vs. 5.2).
Gigabyte GS25F2A
5.2score
MSI 276CXF
5.5score · higher
Gigabyte wins 0by componentMSI wins 2
- 2.2Image3.3
- 9.5Smoothness10.0
- 5.0Connections5.0
- ·Ergonomics3.0
Gigabyte GS25F2A is $95 the cheaperMSI 276CXF is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work. Gigabyte GS25F2A is $95 cheaper.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. Gigabyte GS25F2A is $95 cheaper.
Cheap monitors worth buying
Both work. Gigabyte GS25F2A is $95 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
MSI 276CXF wins on image.
- 2.2Image3.3 (wins)
- 9.5Smoothness10.0
- 5.0Connections5.0
- N/AErgonomics3.0
MSI 276CXF
Today
Typical price$250
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.3
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
Gigabyte GS25F2A
- Amazon Lowest price$155Buy on Amazon
MSI 276CXF
- Amazon Lowest price$250Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | Gigabyte GS25F2A | MSI 276CXF |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $6.19 menor | $9.26 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | Gigabyte GS25F2A | MSI 276CXF |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size changes | 25 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density changes | 88 ppi | 82 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | VA |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | not listed | Yes |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR 10 | HDR |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 240 Hz | 280 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 1 ms | 0.5 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | not listed | GtG |
| Sync changes | not listed | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Ergonomics | ||
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | GS25F2A | 276CXF |
Other comparisons
Gigabyte GS25F2A orAcer ED270$176 · score 4.8Compare
MSI 276CXF orAcer DISPLAYHDR400$401 · score 3.4Compare
Gigabyte GS25F2A orAcer KG271$255 · score 4.7Compare
MSI 276CXF orAcer XV275U$403 · score 5.5Compare
Gigabyte GS25F2A orAcer KG271U$250 · score 5.0Compare
MSI 276CXF orMSI 274CQPDF$400 · score 5.1Compare
See more 16 comparisons
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or AOC 27G42E$251 · score 4.0
- MSI 276CXF or MSI 274QPF$400 · score 5.1
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or AOC C27G4ZH$200 · score 5.0
- MSI 276CXF or Samsung LS27H702EA$400 · score 4.2
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or AOC Q27G4XY$255 · score 2.9
- MSI 276CXF or Acer KG240Y$154 · score 5.5
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or BenQ GW2790C$254 · score 1.5
- MSI 276CXF or Acer KG271U$250 · score 5.0
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or HP 327SE$250 · score 1.9
- MSI 276CXF or Acer XV272U$301 · score 5.5
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or LG 27G610A$230 · score 4.9
- MSI 276CXF or MSI 275QPF$239 · score 5.0
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or MSI 274CF$200 · score 4.9
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or MSI 275QPF$239 · score 5.0
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or MSI MP273QW$240 · score 5.2
- Gigabyte GS25F2A or Samsung LS27HG300E$250 · score 3.9
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.