Asus VG34VQ3B
Today
Typical price$310
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.3 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAsus VG34VQ3B or Samsung LC34G55TWW?
VG34VQ3B costs $160 less today; LC34G55TWW has score 0.2 higher (5.5 vs. 5.3).
Asus VG34VQ3B
5.3score
Samsung LC34G55TWW
5.5score · higher
Asus wins 3by componentSamsung wins 1
- 2.6Image5.2
- 9.5Smoothness8.6
- 6.0Connections5.0
- 3.0Ergonomics0.0
Asus VG34VQ3B is $160 the cheaperSamsung LC34G55TWW is the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work. Asus VG34VQ3B is $160 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
VG34VQ3B wins on connections and ergonomics; LC34G55TWW wins on image.
- 2.6Image5.2 (wins)
- 9.5Smoothness8.6
- 6.0 (wins)Connections5.0
- 3.0 (wins)Ergonomics0.0
Samsung LC34G55TWW
Today
Typical price$470
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.2
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
VG34VQ3B
- Amazon Lowest price$310Buy on Amazon
LC34G55TWW
- Amazon Lowest price$470Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | VG34VQ3B | LC34G55TWW |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $9.12 menor | $13.82 |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | VG34VQ3B | LC34G55TWW |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) |
| Size | 34 ″ | 34 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | UWQHD |
| Pixel density changes | 86 ppi | 110 ppi |
| Panel | VA | VA |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved screen | Yes | Yes |
| Stated HDR changes | not listed | HDR |
| Line changes | TUF Gaming | Odyssey G5 |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | GtG | MPRT |
| Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 2 | 1 |
| USB-C changes | not listed | No |
| Built-in speaker changes | Yes | No |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | No | not listed |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | No | not listed |
| VESA mount holes changes | Yes | not listed |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | VG34VQ3B | LC34G55TWW |
Other comparisons
VG34VQ3B orAcer ED340CUR$380 · score 4.7Compare
LC34G55TWW orMSI 346CQDF$486 · score 5.2Compare
VG34VQ3B orAcer EDA340CUR$391 · score 4.8Compare
LC34G55TWW orMSI MD342CQP$480 · score 5.1Compare
VG34VQ3B orAOC CU34G4$449 · score 3.6Compare
LC34G55TWW orMSI MD342CQPW$490 · score 5.1Compare
See more 12 comparisons
- VG34VQ3B or LG 34U530A$457 · score 2.3
- VG34VQ3B or MSI 346CQDF$486 · score 5.2
- VG34VQ3B or MSI MD342CQP$480 · score 5.1
- VG34VQ3B or MSI MD342CQPW$490 · score 5.1
- VG34VQ3B or MSI MP341CQPHG$440 · score 5.7
- VG34VQ3B or Samsung LS34H550GA$400 · score 4.2
- VG34VQ3B or Sceptre QUT168$373 · score 4.5
- VG34VQ3B or ViewSonic VG3409C$508 · score 3.1
- VG34VQ3B or ViewSonic VX3418C$441 · score 5.3
- VG34VQ3B or LG 32G600A$318 · score 3.9
- VG34VQ3B or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
- VG34VQ3B or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.