AOC CU34G4
Today
Typical price$449
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
3.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAOC CU34G4 or Asus VG34VQ3B?
VG34VQ3B costs $139 less today and also has score 1.7 higher (5.3 vs. 3.6).
AOC CU34G4
3.6score
Asus VG34VQ3B
5.3score · higher
AOC wins 0by componentAsus wins 3
- 1.0Image2.6
- 6.5Smoothness9.5
- 5.0Connections6.0
- ·Ergonomics3.0
AOC CU34G4 is the cheaperAsus VG34VQ3B is $139 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Both work. Asus VG34VQ3B is $139 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for casual gaming and console, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
VG34VQ3B wins on image, smoothness and connections.
- 1.0Image2.6 (wins)
- 6.5Smoothness9.5 (wins)
- 5.0Connections6.0 (wins)
- N/AErgonomics3.0
Asus VG34VQ3B
Today
Typical price$310
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.3 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.7
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
AOC CU34G4
- Amazon Lowest price$449Buy on Amazon
VG34VQ3B
- Amazon Lowest price$310Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | AOC CU34G4 | VG34VQ3B |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $13.21 | $9.12 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | AOC CU34G4 | VG34VQ3B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Ultrawide (21:9 or 32:9) |
| Size | 34 ″ | 34 ″ |
| Resolution changes | HD | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 46 ppi | 86 ppi |
| Panel changes | not listed | VA |
| Aspect ratio changes | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Curved screen changes | not listed | Yes |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR10 | not listed |
| Line changes | not listed | TUF Gaming |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Response time measurement changes | not listed | GtG |
| Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports changes | 1 | 2 |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | No |
| Pivot (portrait mode) changes | not listed | No |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | CU34G4 | VG34VQ3B |
Other comparisons
AOC CU34G4 orSamsung LS37D802UA$748 · score 3.7Compare
VG34VQ3B orAcer ED340CUR$380 · score 4.7Compare
AOC CU34G4 orKtc M27T6$440 · score 4.2Compare
VG34VQ3B orAcer EDA340CUR$391 · score 4.8Compare
AOC CU34G4 orMSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1Compare
AOC CU34G4 orMSI MP225$97 · score 4.3Compare
See more 13 comparisons
- VG34VQ3B or LG 34U530A$457 · score 2.3
- VG34VQ3B or MSI 346CQDF$486 · score 5.2
- VG34VQ3B or MSI MD342CQP$480 · score 5.1
- VG34VQ3B or MSI MD342CQPW$490 · score 5.1
- VG34VQ3B or MSI MP341CQPHG$440 · score 5.7
- VG34VQ3B or Samsung LC34G55TWW$470 · score 5.5
- VG34VQ3B or Samsung LS34H550GA$400 · score 4.2
- VG34VQ3B or Sceptre QUT168$373 · score 4.5
- VG34VQ3B or ViewSonic VG3409C$508 · score 3.1
- VG34VQ3B or ViewSonic VX3418C$441 · score 5.3
- VG34VQ3B or LG 32G600A$318 · score 3.9
- VG34VQ3B or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
- VG34VQ3B or MSI MP225$97 · score 4.3
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.