AOC CQ32G4VE
Today
Typical price$516
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.6 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAOC CQ32G4VE or MSI 321UPD?
MSI 321UPD costs $6 less today and also has score 1.5 higher (6.1 vs. 4.6).
AOC CQ32G4VE
4.6score
MSI 321UPD
6.1score · higher
AOC wins 1by componentMSI wins 2
- 1.0Image4.5
- 9.5Smoothness8.0
- 5.0Connections6.0
- ·Ergonomics7.0
AOC CQ32G4VE is the cheaperMSI 321UPD is $6 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only AOC CQ32G4VE works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. MSI 321UPD is $6 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
CQ32G4VE wins on smoothness; MSI 321UPD wins on image and connections.
- 1.0Image4.5 (wins)
- 9.5 (wins)Smoothness8.0
- 5.0Connections6.0 (wins)
- N/AErgonomics7.0
MSI 321UPD
Today
Typical price$510
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.1 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.5
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
CQ32G4VE
- Amazon Lowest price$516Buy on Amazon
MSI 321UPD
- Amazon Lowest price$510Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | CQ32G4VE | MSI 321UPD |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $16.13 | $15.94 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | CQ32G4VE | MSI 321UPD |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type changes | General use and office | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution changes | HD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 49 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | Yes | not listed |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR10 | not listed |
| Line changes | not listed | MAG |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 180 Hz | 320 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 1 ms | 5 ms |
| Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker changes | not listed | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment changes | not listed | Yes |
| VESA mount holes changes | not listed | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | CQ32G4VE | 321UPD |
Other comparisons
MSI 321UPD orAcer XV325QK$597 · score 5.1Compare
MSI 321UPD orAOC C32G2ZE$323 · score 4.2Compare
MSI 321UPD orAOC CQ32G4Z$511 · score 3.7Compare
MSI 321UPD orAOC Q32V3S$354 · score 2.4Compare
MSI 321UPD orAOC Q32V4$403 · score 3.0Compare
MSI 321UPD orAsus XG32UCG$843 · score 2.5Compare
See more 14 comparisons
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32G621B$340 · score 4.7
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32GS60QC$350 · score 4.3
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32U700B$360 · score 2.8
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32UN880K$700 · score 4.7
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32UP83AK$600 · score 4.4
- MSI 321UPD or MSI 321CQF$381 · score 3.8
- MSI 321UPD or MSI 325CQF$350 · score 4.5
- MSI 321UPD or Samsung LS32D604UENXGO$340 · score 3.6
- MSI 321UPD or Samsung LS32FM702U$500 · score 3.4
- MSI 321UPD or Samsung LS32H702EA$348 · score 3.5
- MSI 321UPD or Samsung LS32H802UANXGO$398 · score 3.7
- MSI 321UPD or AOC Q27P4CV$503 · score 5.9
- MSI 321UPD or LG 27UP850K$500 · score 6.1
- MSI 321UPD or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.