MSI 321UPD
Today
Typical price$510
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
6.1 out of 10 on the spec sheet +1.6
Buy on AmazonMSI 321UPD or MSI 325CQF?
MSI 325CQF costs $160 less today; MSI 321UPD has score 1.6 higher (6.1 vs. 4.5).
MSI 321UPD
6.1score · higher
MSI 325CQF
4.5score
MSI 321UPD wins 2by componentMSI 325CQF wins 0
- 4.5Image1.5
- 8.0Smoothness7.0
- 6.0Connections6.0
- 7.0Ergonomics7.0
MSI 321UPD is the cheaperMSI 325CQF is $160 the cheaper
The best for each use
By the spec rule for each use, the same one the lists on this site use.
Monitors for competitive gaming
Only MSI 325CQF works: 144 Hz or more and a stated 1 ms.
Monitors for casual gaming and console
Both work. MSI 325CQF is $160 cheaper.
Neither one fits: Monitors for work and study, Monitors for creative work (photo and video), Monitors to use two on the desk, Cheap monitors worth buying.
The comparison in detail
Score by component, side by side
MSI 321UPD wins on image and smoothness.
- 4.5 (wins)Image1.5
- 8.0 (wins)Smoothness7.0
- 6.0Connections6.0
- 7.0Ergonomics7.0
MSI 325CQF
Today
Typical price$350
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
4.5 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 12/11/2026
MSI 321UPD
- Amazon Lowest price$510Buy on Amazon
MSI 325CQF
- Amazon Lowest price$350Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | MSI 321UPD | MSI 325CQF |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | $15.94 | $10.94 menor |
Spec sheet side by side
| Item | MSI 321UPD | MSI 325CQF |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size | 32 ″ | 32 ″ |
| Resolution changes | 4K | QHD |
| Pixel density changes | 138 ppi | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Line | MAG | MAG |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 320 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Response time (stated) changes | 5 ms | 0.5 ms |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Built-in speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount holes | Yes | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | 321UPD | 325CQF |
Other comparisons
MSI 321UPD orAcer XV325QK$597 · score 5.1Compare
MSI 325CQF orLG 32G621B$340 · score 4.7Compare
MSI 321UPD orAOC C32G2ZE$323 · score 4.2Compare
MSI 325CQF orMSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1Compare
MSI 321UPD orAOC CQ32G4Z$511 · score 3.7Compare
MSI 325CQF orMSI MP225$97 · score 4.3Compare
See more 18 comparisons
- MSI 321UPD or AOC Q32V3S$354 · score 2.4
- MSI 325CQF or Samsung LS27FG500E$350 · score 5.3
- MSI 321UPD or AOC Q32V4$403 · score 3.0
- MSI 325CQF or Sceptre QUT168$373 · score 4.5
- MSI 321UPD or Asus XG32UCG$843 · score 2.5
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32G621B$340 · score 4.7
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32GS60QC$350 · score 4.3
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32U700B$360 · score 2.8
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32UN880K$700 · score 4.7
- MSI 321UPD or LG 32UP83AK$600 · score 4.4
- MSI 321UPD or MSI 321CQF$381 · score 3.8
- MSI 321UPD or Samsung LS32D604UENXGO$340 · score 3.6
- MSI 321UPD or Samsung LS32FM702U$500 · score 3.4
- MSI 321UPD or Samsung LS32H702EA$348 · score 3.5
- MSI 321UPD or Samsung LS32H802UANXGO$398 · score 3.7
- MSI 321UPD or AOC Q27P4CV$503 · score 5.9
- MSI 321UPD or LG 27UP850K$500 · score 6.1
- MSI 321UPD or MSI 275UPD$360 · score 7.1
How we choose
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.