3% below
Costs less than others charge for this score
The 4 models with a score between 0.4 and 1.4 have a median price of $263.
Updated 12 Nov 2026
$254$300
15.3% below the previous check
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
0.9out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the monitor Acer EB321HQ was $254 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The last 30 days of history are on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 12/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $254.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 0.9 of 10 At the median or below, below on 3.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, it depends on how you use it: the reasons, compared with the rest of the catalog:
3% below
The 4 models with a score between 0.4 and 1.4 have a median price of $263.
#107 of 107
Among the 107 models in the $140 to $270 range, the median score is 3.7.
2 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$7.94 per inch
The 153 models from 28 to 34 inches cost $15.62 per inch (median). Math: $254 ÷ 32 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Samsung LS32B300NWNXGO wins on connections (5.0 vs. 2.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Acer ED300C wins on smoothness (7.5 vs. 1.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Samsung
S24R650FDN$250
checked today
Who it’s forTwo monitors · Work and study
Cons75 Hz · below average
AOC
27G42E$251
checked today
Who it’s forCompetitive gaming
Pros20% below similar
Cons82 ppi · below average
LG
29U511A$254
checked today
ProsHeight
Cons100 Hz · below average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | General use and office |
| Size | 32 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 69 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 4 ms |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | EB321HQ |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, line, response time measurement, sync, displayport ports, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In 12 November 2026, Acer EB321HQ costs $254 (score 0.9); the range median is $200 across 107 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $254, checked in 12/11.
On 12 Nov 2026, the collected price of Acer EB321HQ is $254. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
The price is typical: the 4 models with a score between 0.4 and 1.4 have a median price of $263, and Acer EB321HQ costs $254, 3% below. In the $140 to $270 range, the median score of the 107 models is 3.7; Acer EB321HQ's is 0.9, below the previous check, the 107º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Smoothness (1.5, vs. 6.5 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.