15% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 44 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of $217.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$250
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
2.3out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the monitor Samsung S24R650FDN was $250 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $250.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 2.3 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
15% above
The 44 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of $217.
#93 of 102
Among the 102 models in the $140 to $270 range, the median score is 3.6.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
$10.42 per inch
The 424 models from 22 to 27 inches cost $10.74 per inch (median). Math: $250 ÷ 24 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
MSI MP225 wins on smoothness (9.5 vs. 1.8)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Acer KG240Y wins on smoothness (10.0 vs. 1.8)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Samsung S24R650FDN wins on connections (5.0 vs. 1.0)
Compare side by sideMSI
275CQF$250
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
MSI
276CXF$250
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
BenQ
GW2790C$251
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | General use and office |
| Size | 24 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 92 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 |
| General | |
| Model code | S24R650FDN |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, line, response time (stated), response time measurement, sync, usb-c, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In November 6, 2026, Samsung S24R650FDN costs $250 (score 2.3); the range median is $199 across 102 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of Samsung S24R650FDN is $250. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 44 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of $217, and Samsung S24R650FDN costs $250, 15% above. In the $140 to $270 range, the median score of the 102 models is 3.6; Samsung S24R650FDN's is 2.3, below the median, the 93º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Smoothness (1.8, vs. 6.5 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.