32% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 38 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of £128.
Updated 6 Nov, 2026
£169
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
2.3out of 10
On 06/11, the best price of the day for the monitor LG 27BA650 was £169 on Amazon, according to Monitor Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 06/11). The last 30 days of history are on Monitor Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is £169.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 2.3 of 10 At the median or below, below on 3.
No data on the spec sheet: ergonomics and recency. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
32% above
The 38 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of £128.
#75 of 81
Among the 81 models in the £150 to £300 range, the median score is 4.1.
2 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the monitor, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the monitors of similar size in today’s catalog.
£6.26 per inch
The 282 models from 23 to 29 inches cost £5.74 per inch (median). Math: £169 ÷ 27 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
AOC 24B3HA2 wins on smoothness (8.5 vs. 4.7)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Samsung LS27H800UAUXXU wins on image (7.0 vs. 0.8)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
LG 27BA650 wins on smoothness (4.7 vs. 0.0)
Compare side by sideAsus
VG27AQL5A£164
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Acer
B248YG£168
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Philips
27E1N1800AE£169
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Type | General use and office |
| Size | 27 ″ |
| Resolution | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 82 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 |
| Smoothness | |
| Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| Connections | |
| USB-C | Yes |
| General | |
| Model code | 27BA650 |
The catalog doesn’t say: panel, curved screen, stated hdr, line, response time (stated), response time measurement, sync, hdmi ports, displayport ports, usb-c with laptop charging, built-in speaker, height adjustment, pivot (portrait mode), vesa mount holes, colour and release year.
In 6 November 2026, LG 27BA650 costs £169 (score 2.3); the range median is £209 across 81 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, smoothness, connections, ergonomics and recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is £169, checked in 06/11.
On 6 Nov 2026, the collected price of LG 27BA650 is £169. It’s a trusted seller’s price on the date it was checked; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 38 models with a score between 1.8 and 2.8 have a median price of £128, and LG 27BA650 costs £169, 32% above. In the £150 to £300 range, the median score of the 81 models is 4.1; LG 27BA650's is 2.3, below the median, the 75º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Connections (2.0, vs. 5.0 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability.
The catalog confirms USB-C. Not confirmed in the specs: 144 Hz or more, QHD, 4K, IPS, OLED, curved screen and height adjustment. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the monitor doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.