Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Updated today

Acer PD193QE or Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU?

  • Cheapest todayAcer PD193QE£76 less
  • Higher spec sheet scoreLS27FG702EUXXU7.0 vs. 3.2

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Score by component, side by side

LS27FG702EUXXU wins on image, smoothness, connections and ergonomics.

  • 3.1Image7.0 (wins)
  • 4.7Smoothness9.5 (wins)
  • 1.0Connections5.0 (wins)
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0 (wins)

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Acer PD193QE
LS27FG702EUXXU

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer PD193QELS27FG702EUXXU
Price per inch£18.58£15.89 menor

Ficha técnica lado a lado

ItemAcer PD193QELS27FG702EUXXU
Screen
Type changesGeneral use and officeGaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes19 ″27 ″
Resolution changesFull HD4K
Pixel density changes116 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Stated HDR changesnot listedHDR10
Line changesnot listedOdyssey
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes100 Hz360 Hz
Response time (stated) changesnot listed1 ms
Connections
HDMI ports changesnot listed1
DisplayPort ports changesnot listed1
Built-in speaker changesYesnot listed
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
VESA mount holes changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changesPD193QELS27FG702EUXXU

Other comparisons

See more 27 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.