Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Updated today

Philips 34M2C6500 or Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU?

  • Price todayboth cost the same£429
  • Higher spec sheet scoreLS27FG702EUXXU7.0 vs. 3.9

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Score by component, side by side

LS27FG702EUXXU wins on image and smoothness.

  • 2.6Image7.0 (wins)
  • 5.3Smoothness9.5 (wins)
  • 5.0Connections5.0
  • N/AErgonomics4.0

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

34M2C6500
LS27FG702EUXXU

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

Math34M2C6500LS27FG702EUXXU
Price per inch£12.62 menor£15.89

Ficha técnica lado a lado

Item34M2C6500LS27FG702EUXXU
Screen
TypeGaming (144 Hz or more)Gaming (144 Hz or more)
Size changes34 ″27 ″
Resolution changesQHD4K
Pixel density changes86 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Curved screen changesYesnot listed
Stated HDR changesHDR400HDR10
Line changesEvniaOdyssey
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes175 Hz360 Hz
Response time (stated) changes3 ms1 ms
Sync changesFreeSyncnot listed
Connections
HDMI ports11
DisplayPort ports11
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
General
Model code changes34M2C6500LS27FG702EUXXU

Other comparisons

See more 27 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.