AOC CU34G4Z
Today
Typical price£329
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
5.2 de 10 na ficha técnica
Buy on AmazonUpdated today
AOC CU34G4Z or Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU?
- Cheapest todayAOC CU34G4Z£100 less
- Higher spec sheet scoreLS27FG702EUXXU7.0 vs. 5.2
Samsung LS27FG702EUXXU
Today
Typical price£429
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.0 de 10 na ficha técnica +1.8
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
Score by component, side by side
LS27FG702EUXXU wins on image.
- 2.6Image7.0 (wins)
- 9.5Smoothness9.5
- 5.0Connections5.0
- 4.0Ergonomics4.0
Both prices over the last 30 days
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Where is each one cheapest today?
Updated 06/11/2026
AOC CU34G4Z
- Amazon Lowest price£329Buy on Amazon
LS27FG702EUXXU
- Amazon Lowest price£429Buy on Amazon
The math the store doesn’t do
Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.
| Math | AOC CU34G4Z | LS27FG702EUXXU |
|---|---|---|
| Price per inch | £9.68 menor | £15.89 |
Ficha técnica lado a lado
| Item | AOC CU34G4Z | LS27FG702EUXXU |
|---|---|---|
| Screen | ||
| Type | Gaming (144 Hz or more) | Gaming (144 Hz or more) |
| Size changes | 34 ″ | 27 ″ |
| Resolution changes | QHD | 4K |
| Pixel density changes | 86 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved screen changes | Yes | not listed |
| Stated HDR changes | HDR400 | HDR10 |
| Line changes | not listed | Odyssey |
| Smoothness | ||
| Refresh rate changes | 240 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Response time (stated) | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Sync changes | FreeSync | not listed |
| Connections | ||
| HDMI ports | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | Yes | Yes |
| General | ||
| Model code changes | CU34G4Z | LS27FG702EUXXU |
Other comparisons
LS27FG702EUXXU orAcer PD193QE£353 · score 3.2Comparar
LS27FG702EUXXU orAcer XV325QK£494 · score 5.1Comparar
LS27FG702EUXXU orAOC AG276QZD2AM£350 · score 5.7Comparar
LS27FG702EUXXU orAOC AG326UDAM£572 · score 5.4Comparar
LS27FG702EUXXU orAOC CS24A£549 · score 5.5Comparar
LS27FG702EUXXU orAOC CU34P3CV£315 · score 3.7Comparar
See more 26 comparisons
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Asus PA27JCV£549 · score 4.5
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Asus XG27ACDMS£374 · score 4.4
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Asus XG27ACDNG£494 · score 4.4
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Asus XG27AQDMGR£339 · score 5.5
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Asus XG27AQWMG£399 · score 4.8
- LS27FG702EUXXU or BenQ EX2710U£530 · score 5.5
- LS27FG702EUXXU or BenQ GW3290QT£349 · score 2.3
- LS27FG702EUXXU or BenQ XL2546X£480 · score 4.0
- LS27FG702EUXXU or BenQ XL2566X£580 · score 4.0
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Dell P3424WE£429 · score 2.2
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Gigabyte GO27Q24G£360 · score 5.0
- LS27FG702EUXXU or LG 27GX704A£330 · score 4.9
- LS27FG702EUXXU or LG 34BA75QE£371 · score 3.6
- LS27FG702EUXXU or LG 34G60ZA£350 · score 4.7
- LS27FG702EUXXU or MSI 271QPX£411 · score 5.0
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Philips 34E1C5600AM£350 · score 3.8
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Philips 34M2C6500£429 · score 3.9
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS27D800UAUXXU£325 · score 3.7
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS27FG502SUXXU£325 · score 4.5
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS27FG602SUXXU£599 · score 4.8
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS27HG802SUXXU£599 · score 6.7
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS32BG650EUXXU£429 · score 4.4
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS32DG702EUXXU£479 · score 4.8
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS32FG816SUXXU£599 · score 5.9
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS34C652UAUXXU£315 · score 2.0
- LS27FG702EUXXU or Samsung LS37FG756EUXXU£591 · score 4.4
How we choose
Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.