Skip to content
Monitor Radar

Updated 6 Nov, 2026

Acer PD193QE or BenQ GW3290QT?

GW3290QT costs £4 less today; Acer PD193QE has score 0.9 higher (3.2 vs. 2.3).

Acer PD193QE

3.2score · higher

Acer wins 1by componentBenQ wins 2

  • 3.1Image1.5
  • 4.7Smoothness·
  • 1.0Connections3.0
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0

BenQ GW3290QT is £4 the cheaper

£353

today

No history yet

£349

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Acer PD193QE wins on image; GW3290QT wins on connections and ergonomics.

  • 3.1 (wins)Image1.5
  • 4.7SmoothnessN/A
  • 1.0Connections3.0 (wins)
  • 3.0Ergonomics4.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Acer PD193QE
GW3290QT

The math the store doesn’t do

Price divided by size and running cost, side by side.

MathAcer PD193QEGW3290QT
Price per inch£18.58£10.91 menor

Spec sheet side by side

ItemAcer PD193QEGW3290QT
Screen
TypeGeneral use and officeGeneral use and office
Size changes19 ″32 ″
Resolution changesFull HDQHD
Pixel density changes116 ppi92 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Smoothness
Refresh rate changes100 Hznot listed
Connections
USB-C changesnot listedYes
Built-in speakerYesYes
Ergonomics
Height adjustment changesnot listedYes
VESA mount holes changesYesnot listed
General
Model code changesPD193QEGW3290QT

Other comparisons

How we choose

Source: Amazon.co.uk catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.co.uk, delivered to London SW1A 1AA, on the day it was read, including VAT. The model is the brand plus the name of the monitor; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure the real calibration or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.