37% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 44 models with a score between 7.9 and 8.9 have a median price of $949.
Updated Nov 5, 2026
$1,298
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
8.4out of 10
On 05/11, the lowest price for the TV Samsung QN90F 55″ was $1,298 on Amazon, according to TV Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on TV Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 05/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $1,298.
Updated 05/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 8.4 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 3, below on 1.
No data on the spec sheet: gaming and connections. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
37% above
The 44 models with a score between 7.9 and 8.9 have a median price of $949.
#17 of 18
Among the 18 models in the $800 to $1,400 range, the median score is 8.7.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the TV, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the TVs of similar size in today’s catalog.
$23.60 per inch
The 79 models from 48 to 55 inches cost $8.60 per inch (median). Math: $1,298 ÷ 55 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Toshiba Z670R 55″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 7.5)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Direct competitor in the range
Hisense U7SF 75″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 7.5)
Compare side by sideSamsung
QN70F 85″$1,198
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Hisense
U7SG 75″$1,298
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Hisense
U7SF 75″$1,300
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Size | 55 inches |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Panel technology | Mini LED |
| Sound and system | |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes |
| System | Tizen |
| General | |
| Release | 2025 |
The catalog doesn’t say: native refresh rate, brightness, dolby vision, hdr10+, hdmi ports, hdmi 2.1, earc, vrr, usb ports, wi-fi, bluetooth, sound power, speakers and model code.
In November 5, 2026, Samsung QN90F 55″ costs $1,298 (score 8.4); the range median is $999 across 18 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, gaming, system, connections, audio e recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 5, 2026, the collected price of Samsung QN90F 55″ is $1,298. It’s the price from a trusted seller at the store on the collection date; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 44 models with a score between 7.9 and 8.9 have a median price of $949, and Samsung QN90F 55″ costs $1,298, 37% above. In the $800 to $1,400 range, the median score of the 18 models is 8.7; Samsung QN90F 55″'s is 8.4, below the median, the 17º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Recency (7.5, vs. 10.0 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure real contrast or durability.
The catalog confirms Dolby Atmos. Not confirmed in the specs: HDMI 2.1, Dolby Vision, eARC and VRR. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the TV doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 05/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.