40% below
Costs less than others charge for this score
The 44 models with a score between 8.2 and 9.2 have a median price of $998.
Updated Nov 5, 2026
$600
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
8.7out of 10
On 05/11, the lowest price for the TV Samsung QN70F 65″ was $600 on Amazon, according to TV Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on TV Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 05/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $600.
Updated 05/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 8.7 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, tiedthe in 1, below on 2.
No data on the spec sheet: connections and audio. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, it depends on how you use it: the reasons, compared with the rest of the catalog:
40% below
The 44 models with a score between 8.2 and 9.2 have a median price of $998.
#11 of 12
Among the 12 models in the $500 to $800 range, the median score is 8.8.
+1.0 in system
Operating system, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth above what the range delivers.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the TV, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the TVs of similar size in today’s catalog.
$9.23 per inch
The 56 models from 65 to 70 inches cost $12.28 per inch (median). Math: $600 ÷ 65 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Toshiba Z670R 55″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 7.5)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Hisense U7SG 55″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 7.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Hisense U6SF 65″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 7.5)
Compare side by sideHisense
E7SF 65″$550
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Hisense
U6SF 55″$550
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Hisense
U6SF 65″$600
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Size | 65 inches |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Panel technology | Mini LED |
| Native refresh rate | 144Hz |
| Sound and system | |
| System | Tizen |
| General | |
| Release | 2025 |
The catalog doesn’t say: brightness, dolby vision, hdr10+, hdmi ports, hdmi 2.1, earc, vrr, usb ports, wi-fi, bluetooth, sound power, speakers, dolby atmos and model code.
In November 5, 2026, Samsung QN70F 65″ costs $600 (score 8.7); the range median is $649 across 12 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, gaming, system, connections, audio e recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 5, 2026, the collected price of Samsung QN70F 65″ is $600. It’s the price from a trusted seller at the store on the collection date; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts in its favor: the 44 models with a score between 8.2 and 9.2 have a median price of $998, and Samsung QN70F 65″ costs $600, 40% below. In the $500 to $800 range, the median score of the 12 models is 8.8; Samsung QN70F 65″'s is 8.7, at the median, the 11º among them. By the specs, the strong point is System (8.5, vs. 7.5 at the range median) and the weak one is Recency (7.5, vs. 10.0 at the range median). The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure real contrast or durability.
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 05/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.