Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 or Acer Swift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355?

Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 costs $11 less today; Swift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355 has score 1.4 higher (8.8 vs. 7.4).

Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 wins 0by componentAcer Swift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355 wins 3

  • 7.9Performance8.3
  • 8.3Memory and storage9.3
  • 7.7Screen8.8
  • 3.8Ports and how current it is10.0

Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 is $11 the cheaper

$1,288

today

No history yet

$1,299

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Swift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355 wins on memory and storage, screen and ports and how current it is.

  • 7.9Performance8.3
  • 8.3Memory and storage9.3 (wins)
  • 7.7Screen8.8 (wins)
  • 3.8Ports and how current it is10.0 (wins)

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemNitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050Swift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355
Performance
Processor changesCore 7Core Ultra 7
Processor model changesnot listed355
Dedicated graphics card changesRTX 5050not listed
RAM changes16 GB32 GB
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size16 polegadas16 polegadas
Resolution changesFull HDQHD
Screen type changesIPSOLED
Refresh rate changes180Hznot listed
Connections
Wi-Fi generation changesWi-Fi 6not listed
General
System changesnot listedWindows
Model code changesANV16WIN11

Other comparisons

See more 22 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.