Skip to content
Laptop Radar

Updated Nov 6, 2026

Acer Swift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355 or MSI Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260?

Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260 costs $194 less today; Swift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355 has score 1.3 higher (8.8 vs. 7.5).

Acer wins 4by componentMSI wins 0

  • 8.3Performance7.8
  • 9.3Memory and storage7.3
  • 8.8Screen7.4
  • 10.0Ports and how current it is7.5

MSI Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260 is $194 the cheaper

$1,299

today

No history yet

$1,105

today

No history yet

The comparison in detail

Score by component, side by side

Swift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355 wins on memory and storage, screen and ports and how current it is.

  • 8.3Performance7.8
  • 9.3 (wins)Memory and storage7.3
  • 8.8 (wins)Screen7.4
  • 10.0 (wins)Ports and how current it is7.5

Affiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.

Both prices over the last 30 days

First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.

Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.

Where is each one cheapest today?

Updated 06/11/2026

Spec sheet side by side

ItemSwift 16″ Core Ultra 7 355Cyborg A15 15.6″ Ryzen 7 260
Performance
Processor changesCore Ultra 7Ryzen 7
Processor model changes355260
RAM changes32 GB16 GB
Storage changes1,024 GB512 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD
Screen
Size changes16 polegadas15.6 polegadas
Resolution changesQHDFull HD
Screen type changesOLEDnot listed
Refresh rate changesnot listed144Hz
General
System changesWindowsnot listed
Model code changesWIN11B2HWEKG

Other comparisons

See more 21 comparisons
How we choose

Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.

Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.

The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.