Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.4
Buy on AmazonUpdated Nov 6, 2026
Cyborg 15.6″ Core 5 210H RTX 5060 costs $79 less today; Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 has score 0.4 higher (7.4 vs. 7.0).
7.4score · higher
Acer wins 1by componentMSI wins 0
Acer Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 is the cheaperMSI Cyborg 15.6″ Core 5 210H RTX 5060 is $79 the cheaper
Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 wins on memory and storage.
Amazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.4 out of 10 on the spec sheet +0.4
Buy on AmazonAmazon: the cheapest today among the stores checked
7.0 out of 10 on the spec sheet
Buy on AmazonAffiliate links: if you buy, the store pays us a commission at no cost to you.
First data point for one of the two: the chart appears as the days go by.
Still only a few days of data for both to read the trend; the chart fills in as the days go by.
Updated 06/11/2026
| Item | Nitro V 16″ Core 7 RTX 5050 | Cyborg 15.6″ Core 5 210H RTX 5060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Processor changes | Core 7 | Core 5 |
| Processor model changes | not listed | 210H |
| Dedicated graphics card changes | RTX 5050 | RTX 5060 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage changes | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | SSD | SSD |
| Screen | ||
| Size changes | 16 polegadas | 15.6 polegadas |
| Resolution | Full HD | Full HD |
| Screen type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate changes | 180Hz | 144Hz |
| Connections | ||
| Wi-Fi generation changes | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| General | ||
| System changes | not listed | Windows |
| Model code changes | ANV16 | GDDR7 |
Source: Amazon.com catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.com, shipped to New York 10001, on the day it was read, before sales tax. The model is the brand plus the name of the laptop; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real-world performance or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.