165% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 37 models with a score between 8.8 and 9.8 have a median price of $1,698.
Updated 12 Nov 2026
$4,498
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
9.3out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the TV Samsung QN77S95HAEXZC 77″ was $4,498 on Amazon, according to TV Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The last 30 days of history are on TV Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 12/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $4,498.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 9.3 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, tiedthe in 5.
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
165% above
The 37 models with a score between 8.8 and 9.8 have a median price of $1,698.
#5 of 22
Among the 22 models in the Over $1,900 range, the median score is 8.9.
0 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the TV, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the TVs of similar size in today’s catalog.
$58.42 per inch
The 79 models from 70 to 85 inches cost $18.80 per inch (median). Math: $4,498 ÷ 77 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Samsung QN77S95HAEXZC 77″ wins on gaming (10.0 vs. 8.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Samsung QN77S95HAEXZC 77″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 7.5)
Compare side by sideClose in price and score
Samsung
QN85LS03HEFXZC 85″$3,298
checked today
Who it’s forSports and action
ProsAtmos
Samsung
QN77S90HAEXZC 77″$3,498
checked today
Who it’s forSports and action
ProsScreen 165 Hz · above average
Samsung
QN83S90HAEXZC 83″$4,798
checked today
Who it’s forSports and action
ProsScreen 165 Hz · above average
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Size | 77 inches |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Panel technology | OLED |
| Native refresh rate | 165Hz |
| Connections | |
| HDMI ports | 4 |
| Sound and system | |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes |
| System | Tizen |
| General | |
| Release | 2026 |
The catalog doesn’t say: brightness, dolby vision, hdr10+, hdmi 2.1, earc, vrr, usb ports, wi-fi, bluetooth, sound power, speakers and model code.
In 12 November 2026, Samsung QN77S95HAEXZC 77″ costs $4,498 (score 9.3); the range median is $2,848 across 22 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, gaming, system, connections, audio e recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $4,498, checked in 12/11.
On 12 Nov 2026, the collected price of Samsung QN77S95HAEXZC 77″ is $4,498. It’s the price from a trusted seller at the store on the collection date; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 37 models with a score between 8.8 and 9.8 have a median price of $1,698, and Samsung QN77S95HAEXZC 77″ costs $4,498, 165% above. In the Over $1,900 range, the median score of the 22 models is 8.9; Samsung QN77S95HAEXZC 77″'s is 9.3, above the previous check, the 5º among them. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure real contrast or durability.
The catalog confirms Dolby Atmos. Not confirmed in the specs: HDMI 2.1, Dolby Vision, eARC and VRR. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the TV doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.