69% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 91 models with a score between 7.9 and 8.9 have a median price of $1,358.
Updated Nov 6, 2026
$2,298
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
8.4out of 10
On 06/11, the lowest price for the TV LG QNED92AUA 65″ was $2,298 on Amazon, according to TV Radar. The price changes throughout the day: the current lowest price and the last 30 days of history are updated in real time on TV Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 06/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $2,298.
Updated 06/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 8.4 of 10 At the median or below, tiedthe in 2, below on 2.
No data on the spec sheet: connections and audio. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
69% above
The 91 models with a score between 7.9 and 8.9 have a median price of $1,358.
#30 of 36
Among the 36 models in the Over $1,900 range, the median score is 8.8.
2 weaknesses
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the TV, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the TVs of similar size in today’s catalog.
$35.35 per inch
The 49 models from 58 to 70 inches cost $15.38 per inch (median). Math: $2,298 ÷ 65 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Hisense E6SF 43″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 7.5)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Samsung QN65S90HAEXZC 65″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 7.5)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
Samsung
QN85QN80HAFXZC 85″$2,198
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Hisense
U78QG 85″$2,200
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
Hisense
U88QG 85″$2,298
No history yet · today
Amazon: the cheapest today
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Size | 65 inches |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Panel technology | Mini LED |
| Native refresh rate | 120Hz |
| Dolby Vision | Yes |
| Connections | |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes |
| VRR | Yes |
| Sound and system | |
| System | webOS |
| General | |
| Release | 2025 |
The catalog doesn’t say: brightness, hdr10+, hdmi ports, earc, usb ports, wi-fi, bluetooth, sound power, speakers, dolby atmos and model code.
In November 6, 2026, LG QNED92AUA 65″ costs $2,298 (score 8.4); the range median is $2,824 across 36 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, gaming, system, connections, audio e recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
On Nov 6, 2026, the collected price of LG QNED92AUA 65″ is $2,298. It’s the price from a trusted seller at the store on the collection date; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 91 models with a score between 7.9 and 8.9 have a median price of $1,358, and LG QNED92AUA 65″ costs $2,298, 69% above. In the Over $1,900 range, the median score of the 36 models is 8.8; LG QNED92AUA 65″'s is 8.4, below the median, the 30º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Recency (7.5, vs. 10.0 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure real contrast or durability.
The catalog confirms HDMI 2.1, Dolby Vision and VRR. Not confirmed in the specs: eARC and Dolby Atmos. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the TV doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 06/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.