147% above
Costs more than others charge for this score
The 81 models with a score between 8.1 and 9.1 have a median price of $1,200.
Updated 12 Nov 2026
$2,963
checked today
Affiliate link: if you buy, the store pays us a commission, at no cost to you. How we make money
Spec score, from 0 to 10
8.6out of 10
On 12/11, the best price of the day for the TV LG OLED83C4PUA 83″ was $2,963 on Amazon, according to TV Radar. The price and the cheapest store change all the time; here you see the best one from the last check (in 12/11). The last 30 days of history are on TV Radar.
Reading: We’ve tracked this model since 12/11: there isn’t enough history yet to compare with 30 days. Today’s price is $2,963.
Updated 12/11/2026
The final price is the one at the store.
Specs: score 8.6 of 10 Above the median on 1 componente, tiedthe in 2, below on 2.
No data on the spec sheet: connections. How we calculate the score
By today’s numbers, only if the strong point is what you need: price counts against it.
147% above
The 81 models with a score between 8.1 and 9.1 have a median price of $1,200.
#17 of 20
Among the 20 models in the Over $1,900 range, the median score is 8.9.
1 weakness
Difference of each score from the range median:
Hover over a dotTap a dot to see the TV, the price and the score. Gray dots are the rest of the catalog.
Price divided by size, compared with the TVs of similar size in today’s catalog.
$35.70 per inch
The 77 models from 75 to 85 inches cost $18.80 per inch (median). Math: $2,963 ÷ 83 inches.
Cheaper, with a similar score
Samsung UN85M80HAFXZC 85″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 5.0)
Compare side by sideHigher score, similar price
Samsung QN77S90HAEXZC 77″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 5.0)
Compare side by sideDirect competitor in the range
TCL QM64L 98″ wins on recency (10.0 vs. 5.0)
Compare side by sideSamsung
QN77S85HAEXZC 77″$2,798
checked today
Who it’s forSports and action
ProsAtmos
ConsScreen 120 Hz · below average
Samsung
QN75LS03HWFXZC 75″$2,898
checked today
Who it’s forSports and action
ProsAtmos
TCL
QM64L 98″$2,998
checked today
Who it’s forSports and action
| Screen | |
|---|---|
| Size | 83 inches |
| Resolution | 4K |
| Panel technology | OLED |
| Native refresh rate | 144Hz |
| Dolby Vision | Yes |
| Connections | |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes |
| VRR | Yes |
| Sound and system | |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes |
| System | webOS |
| General | |
| Release | 2024 |
The catalog doesn’t say: brightness, hdr10+, hdmi ports, earc, usb ports, wi-fi, bluetooth, sound power, speakers and model code.
In 12 November 2026, LG OLED83C4PUA 83″ costs $2,963 (score 8.6); the range median is $2,748 across 20 models. The 0 to 10 score comes from the specs (image, gaming, system, connections, audio e recency), calculated by the Radar. The final price is the one at the store.
Today's best price is $2,963, checked in 12/11.
On 12 Nov 2026, the collected price of LG OLED83C4PUA 83″ is $2,963. It’s the price from a trusted seller at the store on the collection date; the final price is the one at the store.
Price counts against it: the 81 models with a score between 8.1 and 9.1 have a median price of $1,200, and LG OLED83C4PUA 83″ costs $2,963, 147% above. In the Over $1,900 range, the median score of the 20 models is 8.9; LG OLED83C4PUA 83″'s is 8.6, below the previous check, the 17º among them. By the spec sheet, the weak point is Recency (5.0, vs. 10.0 at the range median); no component is more than 1 point above the range median. The score comes from the specs and doesn’t measure real contrast or durability.
The catalog confirms HDMI 2.1, Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos and VRR. Not confirmed in the specs: eARC. Not confirmed doesn’t mean that the TV doesn’t have it.
Source: Amazon.ca catalog, checked on 12/11/2026.
Procuramos em Amazon. Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST.
Lowest price seen for the product on Amazon.ca, delivered to Toronto M5V 3L9, on the day it was read, before GST/HST. The model is the brand plus the name of the TV; the versions go in the table. The price range, the median and the position use only models with a score; the price comparison looks at models whose score is within 0.5 points.
The spec score doesn’t measure real contrast or durability, and the strong or weak point reading is just a comparison of numbers, not a buying recommendation.